Epstein Secrets

t 361-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 11 09/15,2007 03:16 PM To leficowItzekIrkland.com, [email protected] cc bcc subject JE negoliabons Ili Jay -- Sorry to trouble you over the weekend. Here are the revised documents with the 403 charge. I have gotten some negative reac

the victim, since she is considered one of the main perpetrators of the offenses that we planned to charge in the indictment. Can you talk to Mr. Epstein about a young woman rumen We have hearsay evidence that she traveled on Mr. Epstein's airplane when she was under 18, in around the 2000 or 2001 t

3 of 11 D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 18 U.S.C. § 403 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5) UNITED STATES OF CA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. A ROORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT 1 In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach Co elsewhere, the defendant,

ered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 5 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA D Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEEh Defend PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney force Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinaft

ned to charge in the indictment. Can you talk to Mr. Epstein about a young woman rumen We have hearsay evide

on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 11 09/15,2007 03:16 PM To leficowItzekIrkland.com, [email protected] cc bcc subject JE negoliabons Ili Jay -- Sorry to trouble you over the weekend. Here are the revised documents with the 403 charge. I have gotten some negative reaction to the assault c

need to speak with briefly to confirm that these facts are true. Feel free to make suggestions. On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District C

2016 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 56 EFTA00184695 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-56 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER On August 2007, FBI Special Agents E. and Jason traveled to the home of to serve her with a subpoena in connection with an invest

ket 02/10/2016 imp ? of; bit :OOsk. Ann IM Re: JE negotiations 1 message Jay Lefkowitz< J e owitz

Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER On August 2007, FBI Speci

ns. On an "avoid the press" note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the telep

you various suggested edits shortly as well. Original sa e From: "Ann Sent: 09/16/2,63. : S To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: Re: JE negotiations Ili Jay -- I looked up some 11th Circuit cases on simple assault and found some good language. I also learned that, every moment that one is aboard an enclo

g your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual

mber Agreement still be operative? I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay "VIllatene, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <Ann

ed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enu

[email protected]> 08/14/2008 12:44 PM To <lefkovinaglerldand.corn> cc "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLST <KerenAtidnsonauscloj.goV> Subject Follow-up point Ili Jay — I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to produce the agreement because we have already provided the vic

d visit him (as reported in the Palm Beach Post). Here is my proposed response: Dear Jay: Thank you for your response. It is our position that Mr. Epstein accepted the December modification by his performance. If you prefer to return to the language of the October addendum, we have no objection, but, a

mber Agreement still be operative? I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay "Villafana, Ann Made C. (USAFLS)" <Anit

nk you for your response. It is our position that Mr. Epstein accepted the December modification by his perfor

anaigusdoj.gov> 08/14/2008 12:44 PM To [email protected]> cc "Atkinson. Karen (USAFIS)" <Karen.AllunsonauSdei.gbv" Subject Follow-up point Ili Jay — I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to produce the agreement because we have already provided the vic

tions of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we c

second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcin

. MUSAFLST <Ann.Marle.CNillafanafgusdoJ.goy> 09/18/2007 09:14 AM To "Jay Lefkowitz" <JLeaccnvitzekirklancl.com, cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? Ili Jay — I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly oppose the suggestion). A. Marie l'illaJaha