Epstein Secrets

d as COnsaa Is binding and ow/ not be Menem arter the CorpOratkrn has made a mid election. (Shareholders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . ..! 1 --1-' 100 1/1/01 12/3 bin, ThUITIMS I UbV UV* I. 2 ( • t1 under penalties or perjury. I declar

-000101 EFTA00227481 imp-u'stuu0 Oi:b0pe Froe-J Epstein i Coapany, Inc T-150 P.004/005 F-135 CERTIFIC

olders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . .

olders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . ..

cases, Congress clearly indicated its intent not to disturb well-established precedent forbidding piecemeal review of grand jury proceedings. In Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), decided eighteen years before Congress enacted section 1292(b), the Supreme Cou

st Palm Beach F September 5, 2006 Thank you for your assistance regarding the transcript of the proceedings from the State's grand jury related to Jeffrey Epstein. I have done some additional research regarding the procedures for obtaining the tapes or transcripts from those proceedings.' The cases that I have

s from the State's grand jury related to Jeffrey Epstein. I have done some additional research regarding t

oceedings from the State's grand jury related to Jeffrey Epstein. I have done some additional research reg

cases, Congress clearly indicated its intent not to disturb well-established precedent forbidding piecemeal review of grand jury proceedings. In Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), decided eighteen years before Congress enacted section 1292(b), the Supreme Cou

cument(s) or object(s): Tapes or transcripts of any and all proceedings before the Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and instructions given by an

July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to witness t

dnesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to wi

cases, Congress clearly indicated its intent not to disturb well-established precedent forbidding piecemeal review of grand jury proceedings. In Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323. 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), decided eighteen years before Congress enacted section 1292(b), the Supreme Cou

2011. A FD-302 report was entered on July 5, 2013. See Exhibit A. During the interview process, the FBI agents informed t they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es, CDs and DVDs, pictures an documents, that include video tapes of d documents (including but not limited to e-mails and other r

d from the following residences owned by Jeffrey Epstein. 1) 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, Florida 3348

e FBI agents informed t they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es, CDs and DVDs, picture

cases, Congress clearly indicated its intent not to disturb well-established precedent forbidding piecemeal review of grand jury proceedings. In Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), decided eighteen years before Congress enacted section 1292(b), the Supreme Cou

. See Exhibit A. was interviewed by the FBI on March 17, 2011. During the interview process, the FBI agents informed that they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es CDs and DVDs, pictures and documents, that include video tapes of pictures of and documents (including but not limited to e-mai

d from the following residences owned by Jeffrey Epstein. 1) 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, Florida 3348

BI agents informed that they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es CDs and DVDs, pictures

cases, Congress clearly indicated its intent not to disturb well-established precedent forbidding piecemeal review of grand jury prorppdings. In Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Q. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), decided eighteen years before Congress enacted section 1292(b), the Supreme Cour

S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1 , 18 L. Ed.2d 865 (1967); Buchanan Rhodes. 885 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 83, 17 .Ed.2d 9 (1966); Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed2d 794 (1962). Since in this case we affirm that refusal, we need not now decide whether or not there is juri

, Gary A. Hughes, J.D, Steven D. Najarian, J.D., Jeffrey A. Schafer, J.D., and Jeffrey J. Shampo, J.D. II

d and forced to stand trial is not generally an injury for constitutional purposes but is rather "one of the painful obligations of citizenship." Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 325, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940); see Deaver v. Seymour, 822 F2d 66, 69 (D.C.Cir.1987) ("Although it is sur