Epstein Secrets

I don't think we are very far apart on this language. I had also suggested some language, to be included in the agreement on finality, provided that Jeffrey abided by all the terms of the agreement. Please let me know your thoughts on these. I will continue to review the document and speak with you tomor

JEFFREY EPSTEIN RAL EEC° ESQ. OUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN EFTA00184724 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 3

f his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly. I will address facts related to C.W., T.M.. and S R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Incase note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.M

of course, is a defense attorney who represented defendant Epstein. Recording information provided by a defense att

EDWARDS: Your Honor, as a factual 2 background, Mr. Epstein is a billionaire that 3 sexually abused and mol

States Attorney's Office will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Terms of the Agreement: I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to an Information filed by the State Attorney's Office charging Epstein with an offense that requires him t

ge 3 of 5 US_Atty_Cor_0085 EFTA00184713 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-61 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 7 of 8 In consideration of Epsteln's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation to victims, if Epstein successfully fiilfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreem

solved by the non-prosecution agreement entered into by Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in September 2007. 88. In mid-June 2008, I contacted AUSA Villafafla to inform her that I represented Jane Doe No. I and, later, Jane Doe No. 2. I asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committ

ified victims in connection with the criminal investigation. Pro bono counsel was able to assist Jane Doe No. I in avoiding the improper deposition. AUSA Villafafla secured pro bono counsel by contacting Meg Garvin, Esq. of the the National Crime Victims' Law Center in Portland, Oregon, which is based in the Le

ed States Attorney 500 S. Australian Avenue RB: Jeff key Epstein Dear Man Thank you for your letter of July 17, 2008. In it, you ask whether Mr. Epstein 'Intends to fully abide by the Non Prosecution Agreement." The answer is yes. We confirm as you state in your letter that the Agreement requires th

ITBI61001 ClEtammeriltain-9iBitEetecaTiRlttifELB5cRellttIlf0221≥B-1180RagBalgeffilef 17 Investigation opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution (among other

032213:118 01453 gP Obef a of 17 Agreement with defendant Epstein that is at the center of this litigation and (2)

ion opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had used facilities of interstate commer

r letter of July 17, 2008. In it, you ask whether Mr. Epstein 'Intends to fully abide by the Non Prosecution A

ed to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein, hoping to secure a significant federal indictment against Epstein. AUSA Villafafla and Mr. Edwards discussed the possibility of federal charges being filed. At the end of the call, AUSA Villafafla asked Mr. Edwards to send any inf

0ame93018faMECITZIEW0MI Clitaaurrenit3M-9EhteeteardgrEJELBMIS981017M3308016agefflgefatM 17 assist Jane Doe #1 in avoiding the improper deposition. AUSA Villafafla secured pro bono counsel by contacting Meg Garvin, Esq. of the National Crime Victims' Law Institute in Portland, Oregon, which is based in the Lew

ling to pay for the transcript. 2. Your proposed stipulation indicates that in September 2007 the U.S. Attorney's Office reached an agreement with Epstein to resolve the case, which was then modified in October and December of that year. While this seems plausible, to stipulate to the facts, I would o

IL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a

his desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

e young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t

em. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be treated with fairness"). In addition, your proposed stipulation states that: "On July 9, 2008, AUSA Villafafla sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards, which is attached as Exhibit 6 to the VOWS& Declaration. That notifica

id not believe an evidentiary hearing was necessary, since there were only two facts which were relevant: (1) no federal charges in S.D.Fla. against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein plead guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, was sentenced, and is in jail in Palm Beach County. On Wednesday, I received an ur

ary hearing was necessary, since there were only two facts which were relevant: (1) no federal charges in S.D.Fla. against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein plead guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, was sentenced, and is in jail in Palm Beach County. On Wednesday, I received an urgent phone message

D Docket 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 16 Agreement with defendant Epstein that is at the center of this litigation and (2)

evant: (1) no federal charges in S.D.Fla. against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein plead guilty to state c

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t

190602 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01O008 Page 7 of 16 assist Jane Doe #1 in avoiding the improper deposition. AUSA Villafafla secured pro bono counsel by contacting Meg Garvin, Esq. of the National Crime Victims' Law Institute in Portland, Oregon, which is based in the Lew

A UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4Srne1 Miami. FL 33132 (303)961-9100. Telephone (303) 530.6444 Facsimile I write in response to your November 28'h lett

response to your November 28'h letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily on that iss

outh Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4Srne1 Miami.

on Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter

ion 2255 provision issue was first discussed at a July 31, 2007, meeting between FAUSA Sloman, Criminal Chief Menchel, West Palm Beach Chief Lourie, AUSA Villafafla, and two FBI agents who met with Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. On that date, the prosecutors presented a written, four-bullet-

rable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein was a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida! In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began inves

resident of Palm Beach County, Florida! In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors.2 In July 2006, the matter was presente

nnsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein was a

d/or 2423. During that meeting, the focus was on Mr. Epstein's unwillingness to spend time in prison, and var

Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafafla have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal law"despite being simultaneously and/or subsequently reviewed