4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
16 / 4
Mentions
ER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: Dated: Dated: Dated: A. MARIE ViLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY ERALD LEK° RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-008339 EFTA00190819 By signing this Addendum, Epstein assert
, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T
ase No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA08300 p EFTA00190780 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Piet Gutty Cate P . Charge Count IJisfer 0t9f41 06CF009454A1A8 Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF0093814A46 Procuring Pe
S. ATTORNEY ERALD LEK° RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP
ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Piet Gutty Cate P . Charge Count IJi
ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Piet Gutty Cate P . Charge Count IJis
in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less. From
lows: I. Introduction This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe") by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Jane Doe's Mother is without basis and should be stricken or denied for the following reasons: 1. It fails to include or be accompanied b
FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON y and through FATHER as arent and natural • ATHER, and STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs by and throu g leather as p
PMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OP
and STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF L
ng Age of Majority, as follows: I. Introduction This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed bother is without basis and should be stricken or denied for the following reasons: I. It fails to include or be accompanied by a memorandum
y and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs
PMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OP
OE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF L
lows: I. Introduction This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe") by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Jane Doe's Mother is without basis and should be stricken or denied for the following reasons: I. It fails to include or be accompanied b
y and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs
PMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OP
OE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF L
lows: I. Introduction This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe") by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Jane Doe's Mother is without basis and should be stricken or denied for the following reasons: I. It fails to include or be accompanied b
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and The Motion to Stay Proceedings

Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONJANE DOE NO
PERSONFL Bar No.
ORGANIZATIONTheodore Jon Leopold
PERSONWILLIAM J. BERGER
PERSONCourt Order
ORGANIZATIONThe Motion to Stay
ORGANIZATIONMERMELSTEIN
ORGANIZATIONADJUDGED
ORGANIZATIONthe Certificate of Service
ORGANIZATIONthe Custodial Parent Modification
ORGANIZATIONthe Motion's Certificate
ORGANIZATIONAmerican Manufacturers Mutual Ins
ORGANIZATION