Stay is defective and should be stricken. The Motion to Stay also raises due process concerns because it was not served on all parties according to the Certificate of Service accompanying the Motion. The Defendant has not yet filed an appearance in the case, and his response to the Complaint is not yet due. The Motion to

laintiff makes reference by citation only to the following federal statutes — "18 U.S.C. §§2241, 2242, 2243, 2421, and 2423." See endnote following the Certificate of Service herein for the complete statutory text.' First, Plaintiffs reliance on 18 U.S.C. §2241 in its entirety as a predicate act is improper; it is a vio

Stay is defective and should be stricken. The Motion to Stay also raises due process concerns because it was not served on all parties according to the Certificate of Service accompanying the Motion. The Defendant has not yet filed an appearance in the case, and his response to the Complaint is not yet due. The Motion to

Stay is defective and should be stricken. The Motion to Stay also raises due process concerns because it was not served on all parties according to the Certificate of Service accompanying the Motion. The Defendant has not yet filed an appearance in the case, and his response to the Complaint is not yet due. The Motion to

tes upon which each and every purported abuse of process occurred, Edwards again replied: "the date of service of each of the above as reflected on the Certificate of Service of each." Accordingly, Edwards has not pointed to, and indeed cannot point to, one act either outside of or extrinsic to the litigation, undeniably

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 today? MR. SCAROLA: I would only note, your Honor, as is reflected on the Certificate of Service, in my communications with Miss Haddad I mentioned four law firms representing Mr. Epstein. There are in fact five law firms representing Mr. Epst

nd every purported abuse of process occurred, Edwards again replied: "the - 5 - EFTA00612154 date of service of each of the above as reflected on the Certificate of Service of each." See Answers to Interrogatories filed June 10, 2011. Edwards has not pointed to, and indeed cannot point to, one act either outside of or

tes upon which each and every purported abuse of process occurred, Edwards again replied: "the date of service of each of the above as reflected on the Certificate of Service of each." Accordingly, Edwards has not pointed to, and indeed cannot point to, one act either outside of or extrinsic to the litigation, undeniably

Stay is defective and should be stricken. The Motion to Stay also raises due process concerns because it was not served on all parties according to the Certificate of Service accompanying the Motion. The Defendant has not yet filed an appearance in the case, and his response to the Complaint is not yet due. The Motion to