Epstein Secrets

portions of the Agreement. As I previously observed, our intent has been to place the victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less. From our meeting, it appears that the defense agrees that this was the intent. During the course of nego

lm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (56!) 820-8777 August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree

ORTH. FL 334614 Page 2 of 8 Form Revised 01.18-08 EFTA00233452 11/25/2008 15:28 3553626 elKt.LII I LICIMINAL STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff -vs- JEFFREY E. EPSTEM Defendant IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY CASE NUMBER DIVISION DC NUMBER CIRCUITNUMBER: zalitcavawanua

E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: AGREED ORDER CONTINUING CASE DISPO 13 AGOR - AGREED ORDER Filing Date: 05-MAR-2007 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E IRisposition Amount: Docket Text: I(JUDGE MCSORLEY) CONTINUING CASE DISPO PREVIOUSLY- 1 SET FOR 08-MAR-2007 AND RESETTING FOR CASE DISPO ON 16-MAY

mmissioner CASE DISPOSITION MAIN BRANCH COURTROOM 11F COLBATH, JUDGE JEFFREY CASE DISPOSITION MAIN BRANCH COURTROOM] 11F COLBATH, JUDGE JEFFREY Case Parties Expn Date Type ID Name DEFENDANT 24167391 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E. Aliases: none 3 1 22-AUG- ATTORNEY ATTY MALINSKI, NORMAN 2006 Alia

FREY CASE DISPOSITION MAIN BRANCH COURTROOM] 11F COLBATH, JUDGE JEFFREY Case Parties Expn Date Type ID Name DEFENDANT 24167391 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E. Aliases: none 3 1 22-AUG- ATTORNEY ATTY MALINSKI, NORMAN 2006 Aliases: none hup://courtcon.co.palm-beach.flais/p1s/jiwp/ek_public_qry_docup_dkt

24 FAHIS - HISTORY FELONY/MISD ARRAIGN Filing Date: 06-OCT-2006 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docket Text: X/JIFA FELONY-MISDEMEANOR IS EPSTEIN JEFFREY E LEGACY 41673917332767 PRAECIPE AND 082206 DATE: JUDGE: COURT: DEFENDANT PRESENT: PLEA: ARRAIGNMENT PASSED TO: DATE: RELEASED, FAILURE OF STATE

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS, & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEME

in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less. From

ed to establish criteria for the consideration and review of inmates requesting the Work Release and In-House Arrest Programs while serving time in the Palm Beach County Detention Center or Stockade Caving been sentenced in this Division)Persons admitted to either program shall be at the sole discretion of the Sheriff and his staff

at there were numerous oral and written communications between others at the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communications or cc'ed on emails or letters summarizing the communications, for many conversations, meetings

stein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, I would not release the witness (id.). I formally withdrew the subpoena on June 30, 2008, following Jeffrey Epstein's entry of his guilty plea in state court (Exhibit B-135). These activities took us up to the time of Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. Fro

to Ms. regarding that plea offer. Mr. left the U.S. Attorney's Office on that date to become partner at Kobre & Kim in New York. First Assistant Jeffrey (now in private practice): FAUSA (later U.S. Attorney was involved in telephone calls and meetings with counsel for Mr. Epstein; when Epstein's

fice and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communicat

tence" (Exhibit 79). The agents also confirmed with local officers that the language in the state plea agreement suggested that Epstein would be at the Palm Beach County Detention Center, the Palm Beach County Jail, and that, during their meeting with PBSO Col. Gauger several months before, he had assured them that Epstein would be

ange of plea on June 30, 2008 but did not have any contact with any member of the SAO that day. Later, when the issue arose regarding whether or not Epstein was taking the position that the NPA included USA Acosta's December 2007 letter, I contacted Ms. Behlolavek and SA Krischer to obtain a copy of wha

pstein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, I would not release the witness (id). I formally withdrew the subpoena on June 30, 2008, following Jeffrey Epstein's entry of his guilty plea in state court (Exhibit B-135). These activities took us up to the time of Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. Fro

IA FACSIMILE Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020. Re: Jeffrey EpsteinMIM NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Edwards: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern Dis

prosecution of any potential co-conspirators of Mr. Epstein, including unidentified co-conspirators. I do n

tence" (Exhibit 79). The agents also confirmed with local officers that the language in the state plea agreement suggested that Epstein would be at the Palm Beach County Detention Center, a/k/a the Palm Beach County Jail, and that, during their meeting with PBSO Col. Gauger several months before, he had assured them that Epstein wou