Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 16-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 4 : tiP • ' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"rtnivz•zrt : . • . 7 'Crt. Rep. lun,L__ Date : • -17 vcri J „Asir )----=-- • / PD e--P:9fot Pres, D

events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. Factual Allegations 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is hims

, represented by Assistant United States , and Mr. Epstein, entered into a deferred- prosecution agreement (

' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"r

ach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691 By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger®agwpa.com Attorneys for Defendant Jay Epstein CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 711.A.3 While defense counsel admittedly did not confer with plaintiffs' counsel prior to filing the moti

l distress based on the same factual allegations. Defendant Epstein has moved to dismiss only Count I of the Complai

' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"rt

tatutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a ci

driguez advised he had very limited contact with Mr. Epstein. If Rodriguez needed to relay a message to Mr. E

d Six, to-wit The Grand Jurors of the State of Florida, inquiring in end for the body of said County of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid. in the Circuit and State aforesaid. COUNT ONE FELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION on or about or between th

esses and register himself as an agent. I also observed Epstein has his El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghislaine Corporation, J Epstein and Company and the Financial Strategy Group registered to this same address. Finally, a third call is received by at 12:02 pm from the same corp

y of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid.

I wrote that, but I didn't write what you 13 said. 14 4. 15 16 you write that? 17 18 19 20 21 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house You wrote in this exhibit, "I got some stupid court s-h-i-t on the 20th. Bull s-h-i-t." Didn't A. Yes. Q. Referring to this deposition, d

his associates. ) (describing character of party defendant Epstein as a "sexual predator" (a term defined by Florida

y of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid. i

tatutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc. 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003))). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Stipp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a c

esses and register himself as an agent. I also observed Epstein has his El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghislaine Corporation, J Epstein and Company and the Financial Strategy Group registered to this same address. Finally, a third call is received by at 12:02 pm from the same corp

d Six, to-wit The Grand Jurors of the State of Florida, inquiring in and for the body of said County of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid. in the Circuit and State aforesaid. COUNT ONE FELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION on or about or between th

ourt. I was• later 20 informed that it was a deposition. 21 Q. I'm going to ask you some questions now 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house — 2S-- three-Yearragerr— Gkeig 24 A. Uh -huh. 25 Q. When the police interviewed you one month Ph. - Fax. 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.,

y of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid.

his associates. ) (describing character of party defendant Epstein as a "sexual predator" (a term defined by Florida

y of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid. i

ery well and did not want to speak with me about Mr. Epstein. She was very fond of Epstein and did not want t

tatutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc. 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003))). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Stipp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a c

ket 07)21:2008 Page 16 of 100 1. The plaintiff seeks damages in connection with her own illegal conduct. The plaintiff concedes that she went to Jeffrey Epstein's house "to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation." (Am. Compl. ¶ 13.) The plaintiff also concedes, in the guise of an allegation, that "

respectfully state as follows: Introduction Six months ago, this plaintiff filed virtually the identical lawsuit in this Court. See Jane Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80069-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Doe v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. filed Mar. 6, 2008). Lewis

A. Yes. Q. Didn't you tell that to the police? A. Yes. And I will continue. I have never had sex with him. Q. Did what happened upstairs at Jeff Epstein's house take you completely by surprise,. A. Yes. Q. Now the civil complaint that you filed against Mr. Epstein for fifty million dollars alleged

in's house you had 17 never told Jeff that you were under 18, right? 18 A. No. 19 Q. Before you got to Epstein's house had you 20 ever told Jeffrey that you were under 18? 21 A. No. I never spoke to the man before that. 22 Q. And you only went to Jeff Epstein's house 23 that one time thre

his associates. ) (describing character of party defendant Epstein as a "sexual predator" (a term defined by Florida

the instant case, adding two nominal defendants Mr. Epstein's personal secretary, and MB one of Jane Doe #1'

atutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.. 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003))). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Stipp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a c

08CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPORTIN COMES NOW, Intervener,.. and files s Response endant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 documen

RCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381A)OC STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, ■. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

09454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPO

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any

. • • ' Florght hitch:1m NeWspatiers. Inca 531 Sq. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing i • . ! to Oral: erre* RAY cloSure order); Miami Herald Publ'g Co. V. Loveili$4, SI. 2d 1,i, (Fla, 1982) ; ; 1 (news Media rtm aktai glyist an opportunity to be heard on questions, ulp‘), • : . .; , • . • .. ; •

ercial sex act. Page 2 of 9 EFTA00182943 CT DATE(S) DEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 9 November 2004 - March 2005 --a N EPSTEIN ..NEPSTEIN Jane Doe #14 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(aX1) and 2 Knowingly, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, recruiting, enticing, providing, and obtaini

ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and

ments to be made to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. EPSTEIN, (c) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY a/k/a ," and other participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (d)

the public association of their identities with Defendant Epstein and these assaults. 3. Dr. Gilbert Kliman,2 a w

ober 28, 2006 132. Lawrence LE, Viron M, Johnson JE, Hudkins A, Samples G, Kliman G: A school-based m

SISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 52 EFTA00182941 INDICTMENT SUMMARY CT DATE(S) kEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 1 2001 - October 2005 NEPSTEIN Jane Does 1-19 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2 Conspiracy to use a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, or entice minors to enga

records. See Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc„ 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing to challenge any closure order); Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Lewis 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982) (news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure). EFTA00182885 06/05/2009 09:43

011 Pages w/cover: 4 Fax #: Direct #: Please see the attached letter, in response to your letter to Martin Weinberg of July 27, 2011, concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Thank you. Documena EFTA00180294 07/29/2011 13: 12 FAX a 002/004 Jay P. LeatowItz. P.C. To ilaiactly: jay.lefkowitzekirklend.cOm KIRKLAND &

oncerning the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to believe that any such disclosure would violate the confidentiality agreement between your Office and

Jack 2:114:5 jackpot 32:9 jail 41:7 Jane 1:4,15,18,22 2:3,7 3:5,5,7,11 5:17 6:8,9,16 11:12 21:4 29:14 29:22 33:5 35:13 42:22 Jay 2:20 4:18 Jeffrey 1/ 37:12 jeopardize 9:15 Jeopardy 15:17 join 26:11,15 Josefsberg 2:1,2,5 3:18,20,21,23 19:7 19:7,1021:25 23:1 24:5 25:25 26:7,11 26:12,16 27:

ourt. I was• later 20 informed that it was a deposition. 21 Q. I'm going to ask you some questions now 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house 23 three years ago. Okay? 24 A. Oh-huh. 25 Q. When the police interviewed you one month Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Pal

. § 1446, this notice of removal is timely. Only defendant Epstein has been served with process. Defendants 21 Lew

ment ("NPA") and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for the reasons stated herein to be

Cacown Gum, Ftos 33133 13 of 315 EFTA00180363 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 15 of 100 Buchanan v. Miami Herald Publ'g Co., 230 So. 2d 9, 12 (Fla. 1969) (holding that where Count I of the complaint had failed to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution, there c

e meeting? 2 A. No. They -- yeah. No. They have it. I'm 3 guessing. I don't have it. 4 Q. How much money are you hoping to get out of 5 Mr. Epstein? 6 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection to the form of the 7 question. Attorney/client privilege. 8 BY MR. TEIN: 9 Q. How much money are you hoping to get

ket 07/21/2008 Page 16 of 100 1. The plaintiff seeks damages in connection with her own illegal conduct. The plaintiff concedes that she went to Jeffrey Epstein's house "to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation." (Am. Compl. ¶ 13.) The plaintiff also concedes, in the guise of an allegation, that "

court. I was later 20 informed that it was a deposition. 21 Q. I'm going to ask you some questions now 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house 23 three years ago. Okay? 24 A. Uh-huh. 25 Q. When the police interviewed you one month You wrote in this exhibit, "I got some Ph. 56

you got to Epstein's house you had never told Jeff that you were under 18, right? A. No. Q. Before you got to Epstein's house had you ever told Jeffrey that you were under 18? A. No. I never spoke to the man before that. Q. And you only went to Jeff Epstein's house that one time three years ago,

his associates. ) (describing character of party defendant Epstein as a "sexual predator" (a term defined by Florida

How much money are you hoping to get out of 5 Mr. Epstein? 6 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection to the form of the 7

0, (coma GOMMORIOA 33133 14 of 316 EFTA00180420 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 15 of 100 Buchanan v. Miami Herald Publ'g Co., 230 So. 2d 9, 12 (Fla. 1969) (holding that where Count I of the complaint had failed to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution, there c

21 LRJ, MEDREQ, REF_DISCOV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Member case: (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Caus

ON Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No- Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associate

red: 02/08/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/22/2008 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (Ik) (Entere

FTA00175604 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 17 of 21 05/20/2009 Ma NOTICE be. of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raise Lions to Defendant. Jetey Epstein's Motion to Ag And/Or IdentifyMf. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identi . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alternati

. 2 I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

legations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary comp

statutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazonl. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. l. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil c

008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7.1(A) of the Loc

COMPLAINT This action arises out of the alleged assault of the plaintiff. According to the allegations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary compensation" (Compl. ¶ 12), where Mr. Epstein allegedly assaulted her "in violation of Chapter 800 of

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant

legations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary comp

tatutory violation carries a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a ci