Epstein Secrets

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:33 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Happy Birthday! And a great time! Attachments: signature.asc Dear Jeffrey, I hope this one will be an inspiring, healthy and in every

Joscha Bach Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:33 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Happy Birthday! And a great time! Attachments: signature.asc Dear Jeffrey, I hope this one will be an inspiring, healthy and in every way worth =ile year to you! I don't know what your mind is up too these days and I alwa

: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:33 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Happy Birthday! And a great time! Att

ch Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:33 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Happy Birthday! And a great ti

EFTA_R1_01682697 EFTA02536613 Most models of foundational physics operate with a continuous temporal =imension, but I think I can see how we get Lorentz invariance in a =iscrete universe, too. I am wary of continuous time, because it is =ypercomputational; it requires Turing machines that run to infi

From: Joscha Bach < Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 11:25 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc As you may have noticed, my whole train of thought on computationalism =s based on the rediscovery of in

t yet know if a proper =umeric simulation will indeed work as neatly as I imagine. 2 EFTA_R1_01663950 EFTA02524659 > On Feb 18, 2018, at 09:00, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > i want to hear more on your views on projection spaces. . also =eel free to put some more meat on the bones of the t

Monday, February 19, 2018 11:25 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc As y

Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 11:25 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.a

distorted. As a result, the =bserver will always have the impression to travel exactly in the middle =f its light cone. This model seems to recover Lorentz invariance, but =ith a slight catch: it seems to me that while speed of light is =onstant and there is no preferred frame of reference wrt accelerat

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:32 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Learning is function approximation. It happens by a computable function =hat creates another computable

model that already captures so much invariance that =ts behavior can be adapted by updating a single latent variable. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 07:15, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > i also see no learning in your system .? . either it instantaneious. = fixed time and fixed time for each . computati

Monday, February 19, 2018 9:32 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Lear

h Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:32 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.a

distorted. As a result, the =bserver will always have the impression to travel exactly in the middle =f its light cone. This model seems to recover Lorentz invariance, but =ith a slight catch: it seems to me that while speed of light is =onstant and there is no preferred frame of reference wrt accelerat

From: Joscha Bach <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Computation itself does not cost energy, only the deletion of bits in a =eversible universe does. Energy

verse does. Energy is preserved because after the universe =s reversible, the amount of information in it is constant. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 16:11, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > Energy comes from? > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:58 PM Joscha Bach =rote: > In the computational oscillator universe

Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Comp

> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.a

distorted. As a result, the =bserver will always have the impression to travel exactly in the middle =f its light cone. This model seems to recover Lorentz invariance, but =ith a slight catch: it seems to me that while speed of light is =onstant and there is no preferred frame of reference wrt accelerat

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 8:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc In the computational oscillator universe, energy has two forms: there is =he information contained in th

verse are touched. I doubt that this is the case, =ecause it might make the universe look for stochastic than it does. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 06:49, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > Energy? Unlimited? Equal per computation ? Non local ? Two places > =t once? Distribution s. Field effects time to c

Monday, February 19, 2018 8:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc In t

h Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 8:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.a

distorted. As a result, the =bserver will always have the impression to travel exactly in the middle =f its light cone. This model seems to recover Lorentz invariance, but =ith a slight catch: it seems to me that while speed of light is =onstant and there is no preferred frame of reference wrt accelerat

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Yes, our universe is reversible, i.e. each state seems to have exactly =ne possible preceding state, and

aps James Tagg will get something out of it :) I am not aware of fudge btw., and will appreciate if you point it out. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 06:55, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: EFTA_R1_01665140 EFTA02525398 > reversibility, the theory should cohort with the evidence. I am =ware of your belief

Monday, February 19, 2018 9:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.asc Yes,

h Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Attachments: signature.a

distorted. As a result, the =bserver will always have the impression to travel exactly in the middle =f its light cone. This model seems to recover Lorentz invariance, but =ith a slight catch: it seems to me that while speed of light is =onstant and there is no preferred frame of reference wrt accelerat