Epstein Secrets

EY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND IDENTIFY JANE DOE NUMBERS 101 AND 102 IN THIRD PART

CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00182748 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 2 JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE

OHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 10

v. Epstein Page 4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, her

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,

Tampa, Fla., for defendant- appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Before HILL and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the government's unsuccess- ful attempt to prosecute Leon J. Wood, Ill for v

' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, that affect all crime victims in this Circuit. After over a decade of litigation, the Majority holds that Jeffrey Epsteie's victims were not authorized to bring this petition because the CVRA does not permit stand- alone suits, and, therefore, it should have been dismisse

pstein. In her mandamus petition, Ms. Wild asserts that when federal prosecutors secretly negotiated and executed a non- prosecution agreement with Epstein in 2007, they violated her rights under the CVRA—in particular, her rights to confer with and to be treated fairly by the government's lawyers. We

ida to some extent). While he was in custody on these charges, Epstein was found dead. Statement of Attorney General William P. Barr on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein (Aug. 10, 2018), available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pristatement-attorney-general-william-p- barr-death-jeffrey-epstein. In June 2020,

t resolves the federal investigation by allowing Mr. Epstein to plead to a state offense. The victims identifi

civil lawsuit to enforce CVRA rights. Petition denied. William H. Pryor, Chief Judge, filed concurring opinion, in which Newsom, Lagoa, Tjoflat, Circuit Judges, joined. Newsom, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion. Tjoflat, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion, in which William H. Pryor, Chief Judge

IDA 33401 April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B New York, NY 10085 INVOICE Matter ID: 2008-029 Client ID: 3371 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice # 29675 Federal ID # 59-2827481 For Professional Services Rendered: 03/01/2009 RDC Read e-mails re: Bob J. and sent e-malls; p

April 06, 2009 Darren K. Indyke, Esq. 301 East 66th Street, Ste. 10B New York, NY 10085 INVOICE Matter ID: 2008-029 Client ID: 3371 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice # 29675 Federal ID # 59-2827481 For Professional Services Rendered: 03/01/2009 RDC Read e-mails re: Bob J. and sent e-malls; prepare fo

-2827481 For Professional Services Rendered: 03/01/2009 RDC Read e-mails re: Bob J. and sent e-malls; prepare for conference and conference with JE 320 hr $1,600.00 03/02/2009 JMB Review Non-Prosecution Agreement and related documents; review Josefberg letter and all related e-mails regardi

2009 RDC Receipt and review LM and EWs Order on Defendant Epstein's Motion to 0.60 hr $300.00 Dismiss, LM 's Fir

rm extension; calls to and from Hills office; calls to VVililits' office; conference with RDC re: BB hearing; on-line search for standing orders on Circuit Judges; prepare letters to Judge Hafele and Judge French to obtain standing orders 03/16/2009 BM E-mail from RHB; finalize Motion for Extension on CMA;

HE INDICTMENT On April , 2008, a Grand Jury sitting in the Southern District of Florida returned a twenty-nine-count indictment charging defendant Jeffrey Epstein' with one count of conspiracy to use a means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, or entice nineteen minors to engage in prostitution, in vio

under 18 years of age, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). Jane Does #1 through #19 were all minors at the time of their involvement with defendant Epstein. Jane Doe #11 was a resident of New York; the remaining Jane Does were all residents of Palm Beach County, Florida, at the time of their involvemen

all minors at the time of their involvement with defendant Epstein. Jane Doe #11 was a resident of New York; the re

FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Notice of Appeal From Magis

aintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before RONEY, Chief Judge, FAY and HATCHET?, Circuit Judges. HATCHET?, Circuit Judge: Jorge Enrique Gaviria and Jose Elkin Echeverry appeal the decision of the dis- trict court imposing pretrial detention p

S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1 , 18 L. Ed.2d 865 (1967); Buchanan Rhodes. 885 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 83, 17 .Ed.2d 9 (1966); Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed2d 794 (1962). Since in this case we affirm that refusal, we need not now decide whether or not there is juri

, Gary A. Hughes, J.D, Steven D. Najarian, J.D., Jeffrey A. Schafer, J.D., and Jeffrey J. Shampo, J.D. II

D.C., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before KRAVITCH and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: This is a frivolous appeal from the dis- trict court's denial of plaintiffs' suit to en- join the Un

we perform in our own homes, and elsewhere. 5 Jeffrey Rosen. The Deciders: Facebook. Google, and the F

WARDLAW, RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., MARY H. MURGUIA, and MORGAN CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. I 1 Judge Betty B. Fletcher was a member of the en bane panel but passed away after argument of the case. Judge Wardlaw was drawn as her replacem

42-110b(a). COUNSEL: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: JEFFREY A. LEON (with Jamie E. Weiss, Grant Lee, on the

: KENNETH M. KLIEBARD [*.2] (with Gregory T. Fouts, on the brief), Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, Illinois. JUDGES: Before: JACOBS and LYNCH, Circuit Judges, CROTTY, District Judge.' 1 Judge Paul A. Crotty. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. OPINI