Epstein Secrets

Colbath Palm Beach County Courthouse Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 June 30, 2009 Re: Epstein v. State of Florida 15th Circuit Court Case No. 2008CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath: rELEPNowc (561 ) 659-5455 rAcsimax (Bet) ) 820-8752 Enclosed i

ency Requet: 19411 SDNY_GM_00331639 EFTA 00204365 EFTA02729351 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. PALM BEACH LT. CASE NO. 2008 CF 009381A EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Pet

ED APPELLATE LAWYERS By Hand Delivery Honorable Jeffrey Colbath Palm Beach County Courthouse Fifteenth

between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein were filed under seal in state court at the expr

ourt erred in concluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (k1.)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. PALM BEACH LT. CASE NO. 2008 CF 009381A PETITIONER'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER

y Disclosure of Federal Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum pending his contemporaneously filed petition for certiorari and grant the stay.' Mr. Epstein seeks review of the stay denial on emergency basis. The court stayed disclosure until noon on Thursday, July 2, 2009 so Mr. Epstein could seek revi

APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Res

iled petition for certiorari and grant the stay.' Mr. Epstein seeks review of the stay denial on emergency bas

filed a motion in the state criminal action on May 12, 2009, seeking to intervene and unseal the non-prosecution agreement and addendum pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(5) (A-10). E.W. alleged that the proper procedures had not been followed in sealing the documents (A-10). E.W. claimed these documents are

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO: 4D09-2554 Petitioner, L.T. No. 20098CF009381A vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Diana

ORITIES 3 STATEMENT OF FACTS 4 ARGUMENT 8 I. Standard 8 H. The Court should dismiss this petition for writ of certiorari because Petitioner Epstein will not suffer any harm upon the unsealing of the nonprosecution agreement 9 HI. The Court should deny this petition for writ of certiorari beca

the other party to the Agreement." (A-6, p. 2). Defendant Epstein also argues the trial court departed with the ess

APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO: 4D09-2554 Petitioner, L.T. N

7). 15 Statutes § 69.081(4), Florida Statutes 13 Rules Administrative Order 2.303-9/08 12 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) 14 Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 in passim Constitutional Provisions Art. I, §24(a), Fla. Const. 10 09112/2019 CONFIDENTIAL PSge 35 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDN