Epstein Secrets

08CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPORTIN COMES NOW, Intervener,.. and files s Response endant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 documen

RCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381A)OC STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, ■. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

09454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPO

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

all those conditions you two have agreed to? MS. BELOHLAVEK: Yes, Your Honor. MR. GOLDBERGER: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am. THE COURT: I need the defendant to 14 sign number D where I had an a added to 15 victim, and G,

Z.= TO REORDER CALL 9546/49599 EFTA00180769 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Count Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring

tkido by them. . Instructed byt op/07.02.08 Superela& Moor pbfeackt jagt 7 of 8 Form Itovike 034 tiet EFTA00180788 11/LO/Zdtlti 333 ,a4g2 JEFFILEY EPSTEIN CASE(1302008CF009381A.XXX148 • COURT °BMW PA'YMZIff$ • • • ▪ • • • • . . l••111,AI. I •IT\olkl•ILI "Vom Wen sms • . . • ' i . .

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Coun

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am.

n's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it. P mg on the production of the NM agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NM was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

21 22 23 24 25 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800SSSSMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / PROCE

. . EFTA00617907 2 1 2 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 -14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF EPSTEIN: W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By: W. CHESTER BREWER, JR. LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HAD

COURT: Thank you. Good morning. This is counter-defendant Epstein's motion for fees and costs pursuant to an offer

COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800SSSSMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOT

e record, my name is Chester Brewer. I represent Mr. Epstein. We have with us also representing Mr. Epstein M

00617917 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Schwartzle versus Publix Super Markets is a case in which the appellate court, the Fourth DCA, was asked to address the issue of the inclusion of a confidentiality provision in a proposal for settlement. What that opinion says is -- and thi

4AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY INTERVENER'S AND S ON TO STAY OF LAW COMES NOW, Intervener, M. and fil 's Response ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 docume

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any

IRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

3 i 2 3 THE COURT: Good morning. Have a seat. Thank you. Needless co say the recent barrage, as 3 4 opposed to flurry, of activity that has JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S transpired is of extreme consternation to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. 4 the court. It has caused me to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi

ck. So I look forward to discussing the privileged nature of the documents. And I thank Hr. Cassell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial docket. It was prompted by Mr. Edwards' motion to separate the trials, which was motion -- for the ob

31:18,19 38:16 41:20 57:14 81:8 81:25 84:3 88:20 iteration 36:8,23 73:12 79:4 iterations 43:8 51:9 J 2:6 JACK 2:9,18 JAMES 2:13 Jane 2:12 Jeffrey 1:5 2:16 joined 30:2 joint 10:2044:25 JR 2:10 judge 1:164:14 7:23 8:2,17 9:3 15:19 21:21 29:11 30:1,2,3 36:16 40:14,22,22 41:6 41:17 43:25 4

assell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial doc

Appeal in my motion. And I understand 22 Mr. Edwards intends to rely upon it. But iS this was an authored decision by Judge 24 Melanie May from the Fourth DCA. And that 25 case has great language to guide this Court 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 20 21 22 23 24 IS 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 f

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNCERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT DISCLAIMER IN THE MATTER OF EPSTEIN v. EDWARDS DRAFT ONLY !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00792811 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

y were not passengers on the planes. And that is true. It is true that all of Brad Edwards' clients acknowledged that they were not passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's private jets. But both the Florida Evidence Code and federal rules of evidence expressly permit the federal rules are very explicit about this: Ex

nto details with regard to what happened between Jeffrey Epstein and each of the three claimants against

ith -- have a seat, please. Thank you. -- being Mr. Epstein and Mr. Edwards, and the counterclaim brought by

se Fifth Amendment questions that were asked of my client -- THE COURT: No probative value. MS. ROCKENBACH: No probative value. And the Frazier -- the Fourth DCA says that even that adverse inference against parties when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them. If my c