Epstein Secrets

vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER This cause is before the Court on Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order. (DE 261). The once-unopposed motion is now opposed by Petitioners (DE 298) and prospective in

ating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, by failing to involve Petitioners (and other similarly situated victims of Intervenor Epstein) in the process that ultimately led to a federal non-prosecution agreement between the Government and Epstein. (DE 1). The parties and intervenors h

DER This cause is before the Court on Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Pr

he plea and non-prosecution negotiations between Mr. Epstein's counsel and the government." (Id. at 9). The C

order, arguing that "case law as well as sound and substantial policy considerations prohibit disclosure of the letters and emails prepared by Mr. Espstein's lawyers during plea negotiations with the government, and require that the letters and emails that Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 already have remain c

instance, advance the determination of a "fact of consequence" in the action. Fed. R. Evid. 401(b). As the Court views it—and Petitioners' and the Medias seem to agree—the facts of consequence that most clearly relate to this action—and which therefore have the most support for being made a part of th

vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER This cause is before the Court on Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order. (DE 261). The once-unopposed motion is now opposed by Petitioners (DE 298) and prospective in

ating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, by failing to involve Petitioners (and other similarly situated victims of Intervenor Epstein) in the process that ultimately led to a federal non-prosecution agreement between the Government and Epstein. (DE 1). The parties and intervenors h

DER This cause is before the Court on Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Pr

he plea and non-prosecution negotiations between Mr. Epstein's counsel and the government." (Id. at 9). The C

order, arguing that "case law as well as sound and substantial policy considerations prohibit disclosure of the letters and emails prepared by Mr. Espstein's lawyers during plea negotiations with the government, and require that the letters and emails that Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 already have remain c

instance, advance the determination of a "fact of consequence" in the action. Fed. R. Evid. 401(b). As the Court views it—and Petitioners' and the Medias seem to agree—the facts of consequence that most clearly relate to this action—and which therefore have the most support for being made a part of th

From: To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Projects Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:44:15 +0000 Begin forwarded message: From: Simon Ghraichy < Subject: Projects Date: March 11, 2

age: From: Simon Ghraichy < Subject: Projects Date: March 11, 2015 at 3:38:01 PM EDT To: Dear ME Here are the projects I wanted to discuss with Jeffrey if I had the chance to meet him during this trip. Could you please let me know what he thinks of when you have the chance? No hurries... Media cove

From: To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Projects Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19

signed by Peugeot http://i ng.corn/vi/A8-e9uEeeKeimaxresdefaultjpg). It would be an unusual promotional material that would make big difference and Medias would want to relay it. What's to follow Bard and Carnegie's Weill? As in Bard I will only be playing piano solos and unfortunately NO collaboratio

bject: Re: Projects Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:45:38 +0000 Thank you so much!!! On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:44 PM, How wonderful! Will pass along to Jeffrey :) On Mar 11, 2015, at 3:38 PM, Simon Ghraichy Dear > wrote: <MS wrote: Here are the projects I wanted to discuss with Jeffrey if I had the cha

ned by Peugeot http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AS-e9uEeeKc/maxresdefault.jpg). It would be an unusual promotional material that would make big difference and Medias would want to relay it. What's to follow Bard and Carnegie's Weill? As in Bard I will only be playing piano solos and unfortunately NO collaboratio