Epstein Secrets

, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (COLBATH) TO STAY DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 74 I MOT - MOTION Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: NONPARTY E.W.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 75 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Fil

-MAR-2008 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docket Text: J FILED BY J. GOLDBERGER. ...... iim 41 NOTD - NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Filing Date: 24-MAR-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: FILED BY J. GOLDBERGER. 41 A NOTD - NOTICE OF TAKIN

27-2008 FRI 03:33 PH FAX NO. 5618358691 P. 02 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 2 Case No. Charoe Count Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring P

ESS AVENUrn JAKE WORTH J. 334.61, Page 2 of 8 Form Reviled 03.18-08 EFTA00233561 11/25/2008 1572a . 3tit. ustetiu i isit.thisto r,:uc o6r uo MOREY EPSTEIN CASEa5020DBCFD09381AXparta SPECIAL gown-loss 1. You mutt undersea Dmg sod Alcohol evaluation end, if treatment Is dawned necessary, you must succe

ructed by: Supervising Officer up/07.02.08 Defendant Page 7 of 8 ForteReviled 03.18-08 EFTA00233566 11/‘'D/ZOOO 10:10 . • $ .140 War VW JEFFREY EPSTERI CASE0502008CF009381AXXX.MB COURT ORDERED PAYMENTS ' .. CRICK ALL THAT ARE ORDERED: FINES S_ Total of fine sunned In sentence, penmen to s. 775.

minal case. There are civil cases pending against Mr. Epstein. 7. CURRENT AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT:

ORDER Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: none. 51 D

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 2 Case No. Charoe Count

erly administration of justice" and "protect a compelling government interest." Oh, and third parties might get hurt. The compel- ling interest is Epsteinh, and there is no privacy issue since the victims themselves are making the request Palm • Beach police spent 11 months investigating Epstein, onl

tify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: SET CASE FOR 6/30/08 @ 8:30 AM FOR STATUS CHECK LEVHLD - EVENT HELD Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: J EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: CR-DAMES. PLEAD & ADJ GUILTY SEXUAL OFFENDER. PBCJ 6 CONSECUTIVE W/06-9454AXX. 12 MOS PROB. DEFT MU

and other non-parties') motions. The Court found that the documents had not properly been sealed in the first instance and further denied Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential dated June 11, 2009. 2 EFTA00184005 07/20/2009 15:23 FAX USAO WP 07-20-'09 14:22 MI PR EIO S & LOCICE

sm. EFTA00183942 THE PALM BEACH POST • WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2009 Women want sex plea deal unsealed Their attorneys will ask a judge to open Jeffrey Epsteffi's records. By SUSAN SPENCER-WENDEL Palm Beach Post Staff Writer WEST PALM BEACH - When wealthy money manager Jeffrey Epstein of Palm Beach pleaded

09 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Lissposition Amount: 'Docket Text: none. 17 ORD - ORDER Filing Date: 10-JUN-2009 Filing Party EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 'Disposition Amount: iDocket Text: (COLBATH) EVSCH SCHEDULED - HEARING EVENT Filing Date: 11-JUN-2009 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docke

minal case. There are civil cases pending against Mr. Epstein. 7. CURRENT AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT:

1 months investigating Epstein, only to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury Mr. Krischer backed off when one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted MySpace comments about their alco- hol and marijuana use.

derly administration of justice" and "protect a compelling government interest." Oh, and third parties might get hurt The compel- ling interest is Epsteinb, and there is no privacy issue since the victims themselves are making the request. Palm. Beach police spent 11 months investigating Epstein, onl

stay one of the civil suits against him. (A- 11 at ¶ 6; A-18, p. 35,1. 18 - p. 36,arporating by reference Supp.A.-5 through Supp.A-6 and Supp.A.-7 I. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80811 (S.D. Fla. 2008) at Dkt. 33 pp. 2-5)).) 20 EFTA00183985 the federal civil litigation against Epstein. (Supp.A-5 at p. 4; S

ify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

Text: TO CLARIFY SENTENCE TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR FILED BY JACK GOLDBERGER 7 1AGOR - AGREED ORDER Filing Date: 04-MAY-2009 Filing Party: JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE ORDER OF COMMUNITY CONTROL IS CORRECTED TO DELETE SPECIAL CONDITION #26 AND

rd parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co- conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr.

STER AS A SEXUAL OFFENDER W/IN 48 HRS OF RELEASE. DNA SWAB. MER 2 A 1GUIL - JUDGMENT OF GUILTY Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 'Disposition Amount: Docket Text: none. 2 B FNGR - FINGERPRINTS Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount:

UNTIL NOON ON THURSDAY 02-JUL-2009. MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEFT TO POST BOND - DENIED. 25 J MOT - MOTION Filing Date: 26-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN JEFFREY E ,I.Disposition Amount: http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dIctrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 EFTA00233648 - Not

and other non-parties') motions. The Court found that the documents had not properly been sealed in the first instance and further denied Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential dated June 11, 2009. 2 EFTA00233652 07/20/Z009 15:23 FAX 5618059846 USA0 WPB CONFRM 07-20-'09 14:22 F

E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: SET CASE FOR 6/30/08 @ 8:30 AM FOR STATUS CHECK EVHLD - EVENT HELD Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: VEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: CR-DAMES. PLEAD & ADJ GUILTY AS CHARGED. STIP/FOUND: SEXUAL OFFENDER. PBCJ 6 MOS W/CD FOR 1 DAY, TO R

n determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection of Petitioner's comity argument depart from the essential requirements of law. In t

15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in viol

ndant in any lawsuit, but the other individuals are persons involved in the criminal activity. All of the corporations are essentially alter-egos of Epstein. Thank you so much. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Pho Fax Mail Gate made the following an

nditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal char CS anainet *nu nntantini rn-ennqnirsitnrc of Fnstein imitating but not limited to Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jur

t of names for a conflict check Jeffrey Epstein J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc. J.Epstein & Comp

— Here is the list of names for a conflict check Jeffrey Epstein J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, In

y a Rule 2.420(c)(9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in viol

EY EPSTEIN ERALD LEFCO RT ESQ: COUNSEL TO JEFF Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

rosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORIsnY Dated: JEFFREY EPS t LIN Dated: Dated: q--,A GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN , ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 Case No

t of names for a conflict check Jeffrey Epstein J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc. J.Epstein & Comp

— Here is the list of names for a conflict check Jeffrey Epstein J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, In

ify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

iv EFTA00792573 INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

YWELL Notary Public State of New York No Qualified in Kings County Commission Expires November 15. 2012 /s/ Howard Daniels Case Name: People v. Epstein EFTA00792607

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REP

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REPL

Uncharged Allegations. 16 C. By Their Improper Attempt to Introduce New Arguments and "Evidence" on Appeal, the People Tacitly Acknowledge That the Lower Court's Order Is Not Supported By the Record 22 III. THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS AND IN VIOLATION OF THE MAND

Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331585 EFTA_OO2O43 I I EFTA02729297 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and f

of two orders unsealing a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum (collectively the "NPA"), which are records of the trial court below. State v. Epstein, Case Nos. 06 CF9454AMB, 08 CF9381AMB. Petitioner was investigated by the State of Florida for felony solicitation of children for prostitution. (

FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PAL

rd parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co- conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr.

fy a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION