Epstein Secrets

iv EFTA00792573 INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

YWELL Notary Public State of New York No Qualified in Kings County Commission Expires November 15. 2012 /s/ Howard Daniels Case Name: People v. Epstein EFTA00792607

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REP

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REPL

ssumed by him, at least where he had, or was chargeable with, full knowledge of the facts and another will be prejudiced by his action."); see also Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 A.D.3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) (observing "the litigant should be bound by the prior stance that he or she clear

INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

A hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Supreme Co

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York S

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Su

's improper Level 3 SORA adjudication stands in stark contrast to the People's position at the SORA hearing itself and should not be permitted. See Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 A.D.3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) ("A litigant should not be permitted to lead a tribunal to find a fact one way an

INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

A hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Co

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York S

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Su

3 4 EFTA00584104 SORA adjudication stands in stark contrast to the People's position at the SORA hearing itself and should not be permitted. See Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) ("A litigant should not be permitted to lead a tribunal to find a fact one way and