Epstein Secrets

rand tampion. ftbdLiidtddafLS teadi.01444.41a la News Emus.* News Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Case In a landmark decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Court on April 18 2014, ruled In favor of two crime victims represented by

tell the girls." U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 359. The reasonable inference is that the "marching orders" agreed to between the Government and Epsteinls-tiefense-eounsel-was-that-ne-mention-weuld-be-made-octhe-ROli-pfeseeutiewegreement between-the-U,SrAttertieyls-Gfflee-anii-Epsteiur as-fie-subseque

0. hi—approximately—May-2009r eounsekfer—Jene—Dee44—and—Jane—Dee—#2—propeundefl diseoveFy—request-s—in—bech—state—ttafi—fedecal—eivikeases—against—Epsteier seeking—to—obtain eorrespendenee-hetween-Epstein-and-pfeseeutefs-regar4ing-his-piea-agreemem—infoFmatien-that the-6178-.-Attemey2s-Offiee-was-unwi

of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E Epstein Case Posted on Wed, Apr 23,2014 1.1.1/4

H • Proven Resells • Willa • Bles SOICh Current Adsak ID PSS Feed Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E Epstein Case Posted on Wed, Apr 23,2014 1.1.1/401 ij-inti reek attiglIST1014 Patti 1 ol IPLIBLIsHi N THE UNIT I D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FUR THE ELEVENTH

o settle civil suits BY SUSAN SPENCER.WENDEL Pam 80•01 Post Shoff Meer Friday. Seplamber 10.2009 WEST PALM BEACH — fiflonaire Mender sex offender Jeffrey Epstaln's secret non-proseaNch weaned ha 'Ouch with Wein prosecutor, was Waxed Friday. Offering the not pubic look et the deal Epstein's high-powered legal c

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

2006 the FBI began investigating allegations that Jeffrey E. Epstein had sexually abused dozens and dozens of

ter-about-the-money isuo, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time-tha

of 6 He said the women have stuck with the case out of "a fundamental sense of injustice" for the underage victims of Epstein. Black, a partner at Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf in Miami, said the 23-page opinion issued Friday has wider implications in plea bargains. No longer can defense attorneys be candi

COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 4 EFTA00605745 • ;2/2014 Prosecutors Must Turn Ow Does In Billionaire Set Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case I Daily Business Renew dbr DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW NOT FOR REPRINT a Click to Print or Select 'Print' in your browser menu to print this document. P

cution agreement with biNionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein applauded a decision by a federal appellate court as a triumph for victims' rights. But Epstein's celebrity defense attorney Roy Black said the decision by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta undercuts the plea negoti

against attorneys Roy Black and Martin Weinberg The case imams a federal criminal imestigation that resulted in the Federal Gokornment leaning Out Jetrey Epstein and certain co-conspirators sexually abused dozens and dozen of minor girls In West Palm Beach. Florida. Epstein ultimately reached a plea deal. und

Purer •"04syclmarkeling tom✓ Scarce • BARD Madating Cityrrown . FOIL a “der ate - Forida • United States Industry : beget Tags :Bind Edwa•ds. Jeffrey E ps loin. Crime Victims Rights. bum or lane weissing Shortcut : prop org/12313086 Disclaimer. Is1111Ors Of 1110 press I °bases are seielytesponsible o

ors Must Turn Ow Does In Billionaire Set Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case I Daily Business Renew dbr DAILY BU

agreement was reached. "Our clients want to see Mr. Epstein held accountable for the numerous sex offenses he

Retw He said the women have stuck with the case out of "a fundamental sense of injustice" for the underage victims of Epstein. Black, a partner at Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf in Miami, said the 23-page opinion issued Friday has wider implications in plea bargains. No longer can defense attorneys be candi

sts the legitimate concern that the agreement could be so used and the reality that any concern about such use significantly and unfairly burdens Mr Epstein's right to resort to the courts to resolve outstanding legal Issues regarding the criteria for payment and the amount of payment owed. I hope this

Jane Doe No. 103 1 0 - 80 (b) County of Residency of First Listed Plaintiff West Palm Beach (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIPP CASES) S int. NTS 0 it Fey stein (c) Attorney's (Tina Nam, Address. nod Telephone Hornbill) Robert C..losefsbag, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flag' e

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS, & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEME

Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Black: Thank you for meeting w

it a breach of the Non- Prosecution Agreement for Mr. Epstein to file suit against the victim's attorney-repres

cheidt, 2010 W.L. 144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010) (indicating that the statute in effect at the time of the violation governs the minimum damage remedy)? Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00194767 Jeff Sloman, Esq. Bob Senior, Esq. Marie Villafana, Esq. March 5, 2010 Page 3 3. Whether personal injur

009381A (Palm Beach) RESPONDENT IM'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Respondent ■. moves to supplement the record before the Court on Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari and states as follows: 1. Petitioner Epstein filed an emergency petition for writ of certiorari requesting that thi

t is necessary to correct certain inaccuracies contained in that communication. First, you state that the Non-Prosecution Agreement "called for Mr. Epstein to serve eighteen months in county jail followed by twelve months of community control." In fact, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, at 1 2 (a) and (b)

Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P.

te that the Non-Prosecution Agreement "called for Mr. Epstein to serve eighteen months in county jail followed

e the opportunitytto meet with you to make sure each party has a common view of its obligations and rights. RB/wg cc: Esq., Acting U.S. Attorney Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, PA EFTA00223111 EFTA00223112 IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO: 4D0

age 1 of 5 DID: 8887316607 CSID: INDEXI INDEX2: JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Memorandum To: Janet, JP Morgan From: Darren I

DID: 8887316607 CSID: INDEXI INDEX2: JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Memorandum To: Janet, JP Morgan From: Darren I

age 1 of 5 DID: 8887316607 CSID: INDEXI INDEX2: JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Memorandum To: Janet, JP Morgan From:

age 1 of 5 DID: 8887316607 CSID: INDEXI INDEX2: JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Memorandum To: Janet, JP Morgan From:

0/100 ($100,000.00) from the above account to: Bank name: Wachovia Bank, NA 214 Hogana Street Jacksonville, FL 32202 ABA #: For the account of Black, Srebnick, Kornapan & Stumpf, RA EFTA01590885 Account Trust. Account #2. Reference: Account 826,01 Please call Rich Kahn with the Fed.Reference number at

t 1 of 2 Account Number Financial Institution TIN 010137770 Account 2 of 2 Account Number Financial Institution TIN 010137770 Subject 6 of 25 : Epstein Role Subject Individual/Organization Individual No Known Acct. Involved Yes Last(or Entity) Name Epstein First Name Jeffrey Gender Type Male P

0 Subject 6 of 25 : Epstein Role Subject Individual/Organization Individual No Known Acct. Involved Yes Last(or Entity) Name Epstein First Name Jeffrey Gender Type Male Page 4 The enclosed mformatico was collected and disseminated under provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act (the SSA) and U.S. Depatme

in the accounts since they were opened does not suggest the existence of any clients other than Jeffrey Epstein. Recent civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein's estate allege that HBRK employees worked for and at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein and that the employees specifically targeted underprivileged, e

ern Trust Company Inc - $8,000,000 on 07/15/19 and S4,657,830 on 07/30/19. Debits include wire transfers to various law firms (including $200,000 to Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, referencing je retainer replenishment in the memo), a $2,000,000 transfer to related account (see above), and a $2,000,000 wire