5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
17 / 5
Mentions
ROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003302 EFTA00157684 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar
ring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typic
here, those problems unquestionably present multi jurisdictional obstacles that States and localities cannot confront effectively on their own. Mr. Epstcin's conduct was purely local in nature, and the State of Florida and Palm Beach County are effectively prosecuting and punishing that conduct. Althou
LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor
LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors
dent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both nertcruy and warranted in view of the le
plead and be sentenced by October 26, and "begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." • • • We are, like most attorneys seeking Department review, without access to the USAO prosecution summaries or other submissions to the Department. Given the substantial issues that have been raised in thi
IS LLP Response to Letter by FAUSA MI Dated May 19, 2008 In a May 19 2008 letter to Jay Lefkowitz (See Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey I= provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with in
FL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey I= provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal
s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f
Epstein plead and be sentenced by October 26, and "begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." We are, like most attorneys seeking Department review, without access to the USAO prosecution summaries or other submissions to the Department. Given the substantial issues that have been raised in thi
FL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey MI provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal
(Sec Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey MI provided what purported to be a summ of the
s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f
plead and be sentenced by October 26, and "begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." • • • We are, like most attorneys seeking Department review, without access to the USAO prosecution summaries or other submissions to the Department. Given the substantial issues that have been raised in thi
(See Tab I), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman provided what purported to be a summary of
fere or restrict the "review process" for either Mr. Epstein or CEOS. I leave it to you and CEOS to figure out
nn Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about cpstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be
plead and be sentenced by October 26, and "begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." • • • We are, like most attorneys seeking Department review, without access to the USAO prosecution summaries or other submissions to the Department. Given the substantial issues that have been raised in thi
Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal
s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f
Epstein plead and be sentenced by October 26, and "begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." We are, like most attorneys seeking Department review, without access to the USAO prosecution summaries or other submissions to the Department. Given the substantial issues that have been raised in thi
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Department review

Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSONKirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION
Matthew I. Menchel
PERSONSanchez
PERSONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATIONHerman
PERSON
Alice Fisher
PERSON
Drew Oosterbaan
PERSON
Andrew Lourie
PERSONthe Appellate Division
ORGANIZATIONHumberto Ocariz
PERSON
AUSA Acosta
PERSONRIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL
ORGANIZATIONM. Menchel
PERSONFAUSA MI
ORGANIZATIONDeferred Prosecutioniriment
ORGANIZATION