Epstein Secrets

ROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003302 EFTA00157684 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

ring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typic

here, those problems unquestionably present multi jurisdictional obstacles that States and localities cannot confront effectively on their own. Mr. Epstcin's conduct was purely local in nature, and the State of Florida and Palm Beach County are effectively prosecuting and punishing that conduct. Althou

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

dent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both nertcruy and warranted in view of the le

on Agreement places identified individuals in a far better position than they would be in if Mr. Epstein were convicted at trial. 9. ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. Letter: • "Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL unilaterally agreed to assign

IS LLP Response to Letter by FAUSA MI Dated May 19, 2008 In a May 19 2008 letter to Jay Lefkowitz (See Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey I= provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with in

FL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey I= provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal

s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f

on Agreement places identified individuals in a far better position than they would be in if Mr. Epstein were convicted at trial. 9. ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. Mr. Letter: • "Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL unilaterally agreed to a

FL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey MI provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal

(Sec Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey MI provided what purported to be a summ of the

s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f

on Agreement places identified individuals in a far better position than they would be in if Mr. Epstein were convicted at trial. 9. ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. Mr. Sloman's Letter: • "Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL unilaterally ag

(See Tab I), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman provided what purported to be a summary of

fere or restrict the "review process" for either Mr. Epstein or CEOS. I leave it to you and CEOS to figure out

nn Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about cpstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be

on Agreement places identified individuals in a far better position than they would be in if Mr. Epstein were convicted at trial. 9. ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. Mr. Sloman's Letter: • "Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL unilaterally agr

Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal

s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f

on Agreement places identified individuals in a far better position than they would be in if Mr. Epstein were convicted at trial. 9. ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. Mr. Letter: • "Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL unilaterally agreed to a