Epstein Secrets

USAO's conduct in this case. Background I. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, inc

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutor

4/05. fold Detective Keeney that Epstein Did Not Take out Sex Toys. Epstein Pmhahlc Cause Affidavit at 14: see also Police Report (11/10/05) at 49 C'Epstein 'this statement appears nowhere in the transcript of -sworn 21.11/Als interviewed by Oacclivveice. once by telephone. and once in person. The port

without any foundation tie doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation. Mr. F.pstein's counsel explained that there could be no basis for these charges since Mr. Epstein did not commit any prerequisite act for a money laundering cha

d & Ellis LLP Joe D. Whitley Alston & Bird I.LP RFP MIA 000477 EFTA00208958 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Dep

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTE/N The manner in which federal prosecutors

ded to review some of the issues and concerns of Mr. Epstein's defense team. Importantly. I appreciate your ag

ese requests. we would ask that you determine whether the investigative team ever provided these trustworthy tapes and transcripts to those in your Olliee who were being asked to authorize the prosecution so that they could themselves assess the reliability of the no interview reports against a verbati

I wanted to thank you for making the time for breakfast Friday. It was great to catch up. Following up on our conversation about the date for Mr. Epstein's plea, where you said that you didn't want to dictate a schedule to the state, as we discussed I have a case where I represent an individual who i

hout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does #1 and #2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did.' Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, many hours were spent trying to revi

r information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you again for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, United States Attorney By: Jeffrey First Assistant United States Attorney cc: AUSA US_Atty_Cor_00226 EFTA00184837 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02

nt set by Congress as of the date of the occurrences) or $150.000 (the amount currently set by statute) or some other agreed upon damage amount. Mr. P.pstein must pay for the services of the selected attorney representative as long as they are limited to settling the claims of the identified individuals.

OFFICE Finally, I would like to address a more general point Our Agreement was first signed on September 24th, 2007. Pursuant to paragraph II, Mr. Epsteinwas to use his best efforts to enter his guilty pies raid be sentenced no later than October 26,2007. As outlined in correspondence between our prosecu

ext week. Accordingly, I have now confirmed with Mr. Epstein's Florida counsel that the state's attorney's of

charges against Mr. Epstein or the proper state procedures under which he will plead or be sentenced arc appropriately made to the State Attorney's Olliee. Continued federal inv ve e t in this matter its led to an impropriety that was unanticipated us well. Ms. attempted to manipulate the terms of Mr

33401 Dear Alex: Facaimaa: mint kirklancl.cOM Dlr. Fax: ConfidentlaL For Settlement Purposes Only, Pursuant to Rule 408. October 10, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write as' follow up to our conversation yesterday regarding the open issues that remain Si stein matter. As you are aware, we continue to have se

he conduct at issue, in an effort to avoid long drawn out disputes over liability in public adversarial litigations. Initially, we proposed that Mr. Epstein create' trust whereby' trustee would be appointed by the Circuit Court to disperse the funds to the identified individuals based on' good faith sho

ance and statements or a member of your Office or the pB12 2 We arc concerned with the fact that some of the victims were previously notified, as Mr. Jeffrey slates in his letter of December 6 letter. In your letter of December 4. you state that you would not issue the Victim Notification lamer until De

h as we pprcciate your willingness to revisit the § 2255 issues, we cannot accept your language as proposed, because we believe that the conduct of Mr_ Epstein with respect to these alleged i ictinis fails to satisfy the requisite elements of any of the enumerated offenses, including 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) or

nited Stales shall provide F.pstein's attorney's with a list of individuals whom it has identified as victims, as defined in IS U.S.C. f 2255. alter Epsicin has signed this agreement and has been sentenced. Upon the execution of this agreement. the United States. in consultation with und subject to the

ng that Mr. Epstein deprive himself of rights accorded to him as' potential civil defendant. While we are aware one of the responsibilities of your Olliee is to provide tor restitution for victims of crimes, this does not give the government the responsibility to enable alleged victims to collect' civ