Epstein Secrets

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky fr"

earn them as a kid in Hebrew school? Noam From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday,

ntributions of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vision, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls "the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity that I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least at the level of

part of August we're off to Italy and maybe Greece if the country still exists. Looks as though there aren't any gaps until September. Noam From: Jeffrey E. (mailto:[email protected]) Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 4:38 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: besides berwick is there anyone else on the jeffre

ere aren't any gaps until September. Noam From: Jeffrey E. (mailto:[email protected]) Sent: Saturday

Subject: RE: There are lots of people whom I like a lot and whose work I respect (and often though not always agree with). I think I've mentioned Randy Gallistel at Rutgers. Norbert Hornstein (who has a blog you might look at) and Paul Pietroski at Maryland. Gennaro Chierchia at Harvard. Lots of others. I ra

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:09 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: I understand the limitations of questions too f

directly. And there's a lot=more like it. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesda

tributi=ns of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vis=on, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls =80 the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity =hat I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least a= the level

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:11 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: yup On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Noam Cho

ms, as discus=ed in the papers I sent you. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Tuesday,

tributi=ns of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vis=on, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls =80 the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity =hat I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least a= the level

in domains like vision (Marr's main concern) and language. Like some of those I =80 ye mentioned. I don't see how to progress in other ways= From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:20 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: 1 you are a treat and=l very much apprecia

don't see how to progress in other ways= From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Tuesday,

tributi=ns of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vis=on, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls =80 the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity =hat I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least a= the level

tel, it's processes internal to the cell. Useful to look at these matters in terms of Marr's three levels: computation, algorithm, mechanism. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: 1 will do , b

levels: computation, algorithm, mechanism. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:jeevacati

ntributions of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vision, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls "the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity that I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least at the level of

stel, it's processes internal to the cell. Useful t= look at these matters in terms of Marrs three levels: computatio=, algorithm, mechanism. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: 1 will do , by the way new =ousing starts w

levels: computatio=, algorithm, mechanism. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday,

tributi=ns of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vis=on, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls =80 the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity =hat I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least a= the level

I don't see how to progress in other ways. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:I Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:20 PM

ntributions of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vision, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls "the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity that I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least at the level of

lts in domains like vision (Marr's main concern) and language. Like some of those I've mentioned. I don't see how to progress in other ways. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:20 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: 1 you are

tributions of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vision, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls "the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity that I sent you. And yes, they're certainly connected, at least at the level of

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:43 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: 1.do you have any specific questions for him?

tributi=ns of Berwick and his students, including Yang. 3. The idea that there is a "ug" for vis=on, language, etc., seems to be essentially what Randy Gallistel calls =80 the norm in neuroscience," quoted in the paper on modularity =hat I sent you. And yes, they're 2 EFTA_R1_01624356 EFTA02498694 certain