Epstein Secrets

Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 Dear Mr. Epstein: This letter and the attached General Terms and

Michael C. Miller Steptoe STEPTOE a JOHNSON LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NV 10036 www.steptoe.com August 9, 2018 BY E-MAIL Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein do Mr. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 Dear Mr. Epstein: This letter and

L Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein do Mr. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 Dear Mr. Epstein: This letter and the attached General Terms and Conditions of Engagement set forth the basis for the engagement of Steptoe & Johnson LLP ("Steptoe"

www.steptoe.com August 9, 2018 BY E-MAIL Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein do Mr. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. Darren K

www.steptoe.com August 9, 2018 BY E-MAIL Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein do Mr. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. Darren K.

e work for a period of six months and there are no ongoing appeals proceedings or intellectual property maintenance obligations. In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct, Steptoe will continue to protect the confidentiality of Client's information after the engagement has ended. Either Steptoe or the Client may term

TRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned

o the case, suggesting in its plot that federal government had intervened improperly to prevent effective prosecution. See Law & Order Commemorates Jeffrey Epstein's Taste for Teen Hookers, http://gawker.comM5751094/law--order-commemorates-jeffrey-epsteins-taste-for- teen-hookers. The public interest in this ca

ld have been. There has long been suspicion that Jeffrey Epstein was receiving favorable treatment in the

from the 12 EFTA00209247 correspondence where Mr. Epstein's attorneys urged the United States Attorney's of

s from Epstein's defense attorneys discussing the case as well. The statements made by both victims counsel and defense counsel are proper, because the Rules of Professional Conduct plainly allow discussion with the media about "information contained in a public record." ABA R. Prof. Conduct 3.6(a)(2). Epstein also complains ab

t 113 Entered on FLSD Docket O5/22/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON

that the no-contact order agreed to during the state plea colloquy does not apply to any of ow clients except for those victims who were part ofMr. Epstein's state plea. Ourtmdastanding is that AUSA Villafana and Messrs. Twin and Goldberger entered a verbal agreement at the time that the list of victim

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/

victims was provided to those defense counselthat Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have' no direct or

rom Mr. Robert Critton is attached hereto as Exhibit D). Defendant's counsel then sent a letter on May 21, 2009 citing the Comment to Rule 4-4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that states that "(pJarties to a matter S Podhtnst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagkx Street, suite aeo, Maud, El. 33130, Miami Fax • Fat Lauderdale E

ed you with a letter presenting grave concerns about possible improper influences being brought to bear on your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspicious that your Office had agreed not to prosecute Epstein for hundreds of federal crimes involving the sexua

n your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspicious that your Office had agreed not to prosecute Epstein for hundreds of federal crimes involving the sexual abuse of children for inappropriate reasons. I asked for a full investigation of those allegati

bear on your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspici

ropriate disciplinary authorities. See Florida Rule Prof. Conduct, Rule 4-8.3 ("A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropria

ed you with a letter presenting grave concerns about possible improper influences being brought to bear on your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspicious that your Office had agreed not to prosecute Epstein for hundreds of federal crimes involving the sexua

n your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspicious that your Office had agreed not to prosecute Epstein for hundreds of federal crimes involving the sexual abuse of children for inappropriate reasons. I asked for a full investigation of those allegati

bear on your Office during its negotiation of the Jeffrey Epstein non- prosecution agreement. I was suspici

ropriate disciplinary authorities. See Florida Rule Prof. Conduct, Rule 4-8.3 ("A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropria