Epstein Secrets

: Miami From: Miami L-1 / PBCRA Contact: AFI Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 1E-MM-108062-FF (Pending) Title: GENERAL FORFEITURE MATTERS JEFFREY EPSTEIN WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION (561) 822-5929 Synopsis: To update status of forfeiture investigation. Details: Writer met with case agent, SA E. Nesbitt Ku

gent, SA E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, who advised that the criminal investigation into activities of Jeffrey Epstein is'ongoing. It is anticipated that Epstein will be indicted in the next 60 days. On 9/13/06, writer rovided an Ownership and Encumbrance Report to AUSA for real property owned by Epstein l

NOTICE OF CO CEMENT August 14, 1997 97-289631 9938/0439 By Mr. Jeffrey Epstein NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT June 2, 1998 98-203416 10433/0610 By Jeffrey E. Epstein EASEMENT AGREEMENT September 8, 2000 00-343624 12003/1257 Between Jeffrey Epstein and Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. AFFIDAVIT By AFFIDAV

ress Addressl City Mailing Address Addressl City NONE 0.00 0.00 Mortgage Record Status Total Tax Buyer Number NONE PAID 145,246.99 0 EPSTEIN JEFFREY Good Faith No Advertise No Parent Collect No Installment No 0 0 0 0 SUPPLMNTRY PL OF EL BRAVO PARKW 24.30 FT OF LT 39 & LT 40 B 358 EL BR

ENCEMENT June 2, 1998 98-203416 10433/0610 By Jeffrey E. Epstein EASEMENT AGREEMENT September 8, 2000

ENCEMENT June 2, 1998 98-203416 10433/0610 By Jeffrey E. Epstein EASEMENT AGREEMENT September 8, 2000 0

LE INSURANCE COMPANY 7735 NW 48TH ST., STE 100, MIAMI, FL 33165 (305)265-7000 Fax: (305)261-2110 ORDER NUMBER 370701021 ESCROW NUMBER: 001 FBI, Palm Beach Co., RA 505 S Flaglor Drive, Suite 600 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 1 /3107 INVOICE AS OF: 03/27/07 ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE: 03/21/07 Buyer: Prop

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c)( I). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff Jane Doe has failed to carry her burden of showing that anything on the Epstein interview tape sought through the subpoenas challenged here may be compelled from movants under either the reporter's privilege recognized in this

prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein." Edwards then cites a deposition transcript, without providing the relevant pages, "wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News." Offering this as a "criminal event," Edwards states that, "[

on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for Jane. Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE

on that any of those people . . . have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victi

rs that he that he was "one of M's many 'Johns.'" See Complaint Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & M s, No. 50 2009 CA0 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jut Cir., Palm Beach Co., Dec. 7, 2009) at 146(a), pertinent pages annexed as Ex. E to the Carroll Reply Dec1.12 As for alleged "derogatory remarks" about M., they would su

mmary judgment in the Ponzi Scheme Action. SJ Motion at 1 (Edwards "is entitled to summary judgment for all claims brought against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint" because "the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards' involvement in the prosecution of legitimat

alternative sources before it may be subpoenaed from any non-party in New York. In fact, Edwards concedes in his own Florida court filings that the Epstein interview is, at best, cumulative of "overwhelming evidence" he has already obtained from several alternative sources. Second, even if Edwards were

made of a confidential unpublished interview of Jeffrey Epstein. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT In this ancillar

d not, publish the information imparted to me by Mr. Epstein during the interview. Rush Supp. Aft 17 (emphasi

scovery practices during the course of the sex abuse litigation against Epstein. Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG (Fl. Cir. Ct., Palm Beach Co.) (the "Ponzi Scheme Action"). In response, Edwards filed an abuse of process counterclaim alleging that Epstein filed the Ponzi Scheme Action for t