Epstein Secrets

(14416 1 P R/1 SOA(16 EFTA00228253 Pagel of 48 ACCOUNT NUMBER PAYMENT DUE DATE NEW BALANCE MINIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsimile Copy Chair: Gold MasterCard❑ ACCOUNT NUMBER: NEW BALAN

INIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4T

r.-. JE FFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE CAD J EPSTEIN CO 4TH Fl. NEW YORK NY 100224843 CHASE Facsími

livarer•••••• fatlaeal Data flee 929 WI 211441 Tin Outs 0.1 010.4144 401114,144 s470.•41414 4•01110 017114 MARIS MIA ROLM •Cia, Pilme.01coari. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN ai Ulialetl YtP1r i a A1100,4482 PA, 213114 mad 11• Void Void Void Void Void. 480,WICIFF0084.1441.4131110AL VA/1044144111048111141014011118 fl YMO

M a Nen ESEnce ..,,,,.E a. Ofs $10 ao S000 (*ISO! SI* 43 Mann Endes. --Sad WI 0 `... 0. 4 ,a' 1/4.1. Mot ea • •••••• EN. <4, K. Pro Ess IMO JE ETA* 00 .1 MECO 014 FL WM VOW NY TOCOMMI 1...1111-11 ..... CHASE 0 CMOIADASEP SERVICE PO SOX 15 113 WHIANOTOIE Cf illebSSIS3 Cavan/ DA, 0.

32.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsi

l opinions, referred to a reviewer's techniques as "se h mechanisms" and referred to his activities as a "search." Commonwealth I. Ellis, 10 Mass. L. Rptr. 429, 1999 WL 815818 at 4'10 (Mass. Super. 1999) ("[f]or most of the search, he worked alone"). However, not all examinations of data are Fourth Am

to as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. J

A00207294 expressions of confidence in the strength of the evidence in her own case may be found at, e.g., SJ Opp 2 (Doe "has ample evidence that [Epstein] committed federal sex offenses against her"); 11 (Epstein's fraudulent concealment of assets "evidences [his] awareness that he is liable to the gi

sue EPSTEIN and like other RRA clients, sought tens of millions of dollars. a. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, was insistent that "Jeffrey is an awesome man." (p. 21 — FBI); At the conclusion of she stated: "I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it

sh attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday,

o Fed. R Civ. Proc. 26(cXI). 3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of E & J Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc. 33 Med. L. Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.). 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr

to as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER, S.D. Ma. Civil Docket for Jane Doe v. J

A00612027 expressions of confidence in the strength of the evidence in her own case may be found at, e.g., SJ Opp 2 (Doe "has ample evidence that [Epstein] committed federal sex offenses against her"); 11 (Epstein's fraudulent concealment of assets "evidences [his] awareness that he is liable to the gi

pportunity and content with their experiences: A: None of my girls ever had a problem and they'd call me. They'd beg me, you know, for us to go to Jeffrey's house because they love Jeffrey. Jeffrey is a respectful man. He really is. I mean, and he all thought we were of age always. This is what's so s

sh attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday,

o Fed. R Civ. Proc. 26(cXI). 3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of E & J Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc. 33 Med. L. Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.). 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr