Epstein Secrets

nvestment in the D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund (the "Fund"). Jeepers alleges that during a conversation with Mr. Zwim on November 13, 2006, Jeffrey Epstein, Jeepers' owner, asked to redeem Jeepers' entire investment (worth approximately $135 million at that time). Jeepers alleges that Mr. Zwim promised

ner, asked to redeem Jeepers' entire investment (worth approximately $135 million at that time). Jeepers alleges that Mr. Zwim promised that if Mr. Epstein sought to redeem only $80 million of Jeepers' investment, that request would be honored quickly.2 We contend that Mr. Epstein's allegations arc a r

conversation with Mr. Zwim on November 13, 2006, Jeffrey Epstein, Jeepers' owner, asked to redeem Jeepers

. Jeepers alleges that Mr. Zwim promised that if Mr. Epstein sought to redeem only $80 million of Jeepers' in

Fortress VRF I LLC and Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC v. Jeepers, Inc. JAMS Ref. No. 1425006537 Dear Judge Carpinello: Third-Party Respondents Daniel B. Zwim, D.B. Zwim & Co. L.P. ("DBZ"), DBZ GP, and Zwirn Holdings, LLC submit this letter in response to Third-Party Claimants Financial Trust Company, Inc

1. Jeffrey Epstein and Financial Trust Company, Inc. invested hundreds of millions of dollars with Highbridge as an investment manager with its many sub-advisors from

ose sub-advisors beginning in 2002 and, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission, remained a sub-advisor through at least 2007. 3. Mr. Epstein has had virtually no contact with Mr. Zwim, except for a five minute face-to-face introduction and various telephone calls trying to resolve dispute

1. Jeffrey Epstein and Financial Trust Company, Inc. investe

mained a sub-advisor through at least 2007. 3. Mr. Epstein has had virtually no contact with Mr. Zwim, excep

y, Inc. invested hundreds of millions of dollars with Highbridge as an investment manager with its many sub-advisors from 2001 to the present. 2. Daniel B. Zwim had been one of those sub-advisors beginning in 2002 and, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission, remained a sub-advisor through at le

all depositions, shall be concluded by June 1, 2011. 2. Counsel for the parties have agreed that depositions will occur in the following order: Jeffrey E. Epstein -first deposed- (principal of leepers, Inc.) Daniel B. Zwim (individually and principal of D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. and relat

s will occur in the following order: Jeffrey E. Epstein -first deposed- (principal of leepers, Inc.) Da

depositions will occur in the following order: Jeffrey E. Epstein -first deposed- (principal of leepers,

depositions will occur in the following order: Jeffrey E. Epstein -first deposed- (principal of leepers, I

l for the parties have agreed that depositions will occur in the following order: Jeffrey E. Epstein -first deposed- (principal of leepers, Inc.) Daniel B. Zwim (individually and principal of D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. and related Zwirn entities) Glenn Dubin Harry Beller David Lee (no

tner, Henry Swieca, owned a significant portion of D.B. Zwim & Co., L.P. 4. Financial Trust Company, Inc. ("FTC"), which I understand was owned by Jeffrey Epstein, was an important client of Dubin and Highbridge, and I understand that FTC had made the majority of its substantial investment in the D.B. Zwirn Sp

o. The irregularities impacted both the Highbridge account and the funds that D.B. Zwim & Co. managed. 6. In late October 2006, Dubin told me that Epstein was very nervous about the revelations of the issues at Zwim's management company. Dubin told me that Epstein was demanding to withdraw FTC's entir

ny, Inc. ("FTC"), which I understand was owned by Jeffrey Epstein, was an important client of Dubin and Hi

reported to Glenn Dubin ("Dubin"), the Chief Executive Officer of Highbridge. 3. Highbridge had a significant amount of money that was managed by Daniel B. Zwim ("Zwim") and his investment management company, D.B. Zwirn & Co, L.P. As well, Dubin and his partner, Henry Swieca, owned a significant portion of