Epstein Secrets

United States Attorney' t of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client and The U.S. Attorney's Office has learned that rey stein as app ied to participate in the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office's ("PBSO") work release program, and PBSO has ranted that a lication. Mr. E ste

tein ias app ied to participate in the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office's ("PBSO") work release program, and PBSO has ranted that a lication. Mr. E stein is reportedly working for The Florida Science Foundation at est Palm Beach, FL 33401. After work each day, Mr. Epstein returns to the Palm Beach C

est Palm Beach, FL 33401. After work each day, Mr. Epstein returns to the Palm Beach County Stockade. While

's handling of the matter involving your client, Jeffrey Epstein. We have received and reviewed your lette

REY EPSTEIN RAL EFCOUR ESQ. OUNSEL TO JF_FER .Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

strict of Florida 99 NE 4th Street ' Miami, Florida 33132 Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does In and #2 v. United States, Case No.: 08.80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

osecution Agreement, an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at 13).' Included in this preservation order are all Documents and data, including electronically stored information ("ES1"), relating to th

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein Dear Rolando: I write in my capacity as

Villafana indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA) entered into negotiations t

. Ste. 400 W. Palm Beach, Fl. 33401 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #2I United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein Dear Rolando: I write in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States At

osecution Agreement. an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at ¶3).r I assume those involved in the above-referenced litigation, have copies of the relevant court filings, but if you desire any of the

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting co

A. Marie indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA] entered into negotiations t

NE slIt' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Commication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21 United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni