Epstein Secrets

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

est of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage

nt did the Justice Department contact any victims, including Jane Doe #1, about their views on the non- prosecution. 25. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. , First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, noting the U.S. Attorney's Office's legal obligations to keep victims informed of th

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

edule. I. Between about 2003 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant politica

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." U.S. Attorney'

nt's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

tes ultimately resolved the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein with a formal non-prosecution agreement,

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gr

e. The victims will argue that, because they were receiving CVRA notices and because the United States ultimately resolved the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein with a formal non-prosecution agreement, the CVRA applied. The United States will respond that, because no indictment was ever filed in the case, th

ellate review of the court's dismissal. If, on the other hand, the Court rules that the CVRA did apply while the United States was negotiating with Epstein, then the United States is willing to stipulate that it did not comply with the CVRA because it did afford the victims their right to confer about

e victims by letter after COB Thursday, November 29th. U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 255 (emphasis rearranged). 17. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit The letter stated: Finally, let me addr

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the EFTA00207825 District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly."

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

f this signed non- prosecution agreement. For example, the U.S. Attorney's Office stopped sending victim notifications about the case when defendant Epstein objected. Indeed, the Office went so far as to send (in January 2008) a false victim notification letter to the victims informing them that the "ca

sending victim notifications about the case when defendant Epstein objected. Indeed, the Office went so far as to s

between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Based on this correspondence and other

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." U.S. Attorney'

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

est of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

edule. I. Between about 2003 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant politica

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." U.S. Attorney'

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

f this signed non- prosecution agreement. For example, the U.S. Attorney's Office stopped sending victim notifications about the case when defendant Epstein objected. Indeed, the Office went so far as to send (in January 2008) a false victim notification letter to the victims informing them that the "ca

sending victim notifications about the case when defendant Epstein objected. Indeed, the Office went so far as to s

between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Based on this correspondence and other

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

counsel: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Groff telephone call. If he was in Mimi-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly." U.S. Attorney'