Epstein Secrets

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

est of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage

nt did the Justice Department contact any victims, including Jane Doe #1, about their views on the non- prosecution. 25. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. , First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, noting the U.S. Attorney's Office's legal obligations to keep victims informed of th

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

edule. I. Between about 2003 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant politica

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the plea agreement that had been negotiated between them. See Attachment 1 to Edwards Aff. These e-mail disclosed for the first time the steps that had been taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid having the victims in the case lear

Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The notification letter explained: "I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms . ." The letter then we

est of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

edule. I. Between about 2003 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant politica

l: "On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the Ms. Gro

U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the plea agreement that had been negotiated between them. See Attachment 1 to Edwards Aff. These e-mail disclosed for the first time the steps that had been taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid having the victims in the case lear

the victims explained in their motion for summary judgment (DE 361), the undisputed facts of this case show that for nine months, the Government and Epstein conspired to conceal a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) from Epstein's victims in order to prevent them from voicing any objection to the agreement.

ed Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for injuries my clients suffered as a consequence of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of them. 2. I have previously filed an affidavit in this matter (see DE 225-1). This affidavit repeats some of the information contai

Undisputed Fact 1 ("Between about 1999 and 2007, Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls,

she, herself] procured additional young women for Mr. Epstein and [was] paid commissions or referral fees for

re the prosecution of Epstein — and the Government was assiduously trying to conceal the agreement it had reached with Epstein. See DE 361 at 31-39; Edwards Aff. of Aug. 11, 2017, at 11 11-19. All of the Government's arguments about what Jane Doe 2 was doing back in April 2007 have no relevance to that time

simple one. The Government cannot contest that it concealed from the victims a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that it reached with a sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, who had committed federal crimes against dozens of minor victims. I EFTA00597318 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 417 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/1

Florida, located in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere in the United States and overseas. Victims' S.J. Mot., DE 361 at 8, 1 1. Because Epstein and his co-conspirators knowingly traveled in interstate and international commerce to sexually abuse Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and other similarly s

ement (NPA) that it reached with a sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, who had committed federal crimes against

er about the money issue, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time tha

filed a detailed affidavit from the victims' attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, about the nature of the calls that he had with the line prosecutor. See Edwards Aff. of Aug. II, 2017, at IN 11.25. If the Government fails to dispute that affidavit, of course that affidavit would provide additional evidence suppor