Epstein Secrets

y Lefkowitz in Support of Their Motion for a Protective Order Concerning Production, Use, and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations (Doc. 161); Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's 3 EFTA00177813 A. The Applicability of Rule 410. Any assessment of the merits of the intervenors' contentions must begin with an understanding

tion agreement" ("the agreement") between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO/SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein (Epstein) pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. §3771. Under the agreement, Epstein agreed to (1) plead guilty to two then pend

the Southern District of Florida (USAO/SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein (Epstein) pursuant to the Crime Victims'

ould render Rule 410 ambiguous and would violate Mr. Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights. The rule's central fea

152 ORDER grantingil Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge on 3/29/2012. (ir) (Entered: 03/29/2012) 04/17/2012 1611 MOTION for Protective Order by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Lefkowitz and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations by Ro

to Intervene on a Limited Basis filed by United States of America. Replies due by 2/2/2015. ( ) (Entered: 01/22/2015) 295 MOTION Limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Order Requesting Justification for Supplemental Protective Order re 286 Order by Jeffrey Epstein. (Black, Roy) Modified to re- docket, s

iled by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 10/28/2013) MOTION to Expedite Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Unopposed Motion for Expedited Ruling on Epstein's Unopposed Motion for Intervention in Advance of Eleventh Circuit Argument by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Edwards, Bradley)

t Palm Beach, Fl 33401 561-202-6360 Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Intervenor Alan M. Dershowitz Interven

nt conference 385 386 388 , the Court finds that Mr. Epstein's interest in this case is adequately preserved b

ing 93 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 3/29/2012. (ir) (Entered: 03/29/2012) 04/17/2012 160 MOTION for Protective Order by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Lefkowitz and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations by Ro

OTION for Protective Order by Limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein And Opposition To Motions of Jane Doe 1 A

f Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations, [162] MOTION for Protective Order by Limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein And Opposition To Motions of Jane Doe 1 And Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations, [161] MOTION for Protective Order

r Protective Order by Limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein And Opposition To Motions of Jane Doe 1 And Jane

ase Number: 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Filer: Jane Doe Document Number: 167 Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [160] MOTION for Protective Order by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Lefkowitz and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations, [162

mited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein And Opposition To Motions of Jane Doe 1 And Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations by Jeffrey Epstein. (Perczek, Jacqueline) (Entered: 04/17/2012) 04/17/2012 164 SUPPLEMENTAL Briefing in support of Motion for a Protective Order concerning Productio

atabase - flsd Page 4 of 24 Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein represented by Jacqueline Perczek (See above fo

- Live Database - flsd Page 4 of 24 Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein represented by Jacqueline Perczek (See

Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/19/2012. (dby) (Entered: 04/19/2012) 04/23/2012 169 REPLY to Response to Motion re 160 MOTION for Protective Order by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Lefkowitz and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations, Le M

tervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz's opposition to the motion, including motion for protective order [DE 160, 161]; intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's opposition to the motion, including motion for protective order [DE 162]; intervenors' notice of supplemental authority in support of asserted comm

er Rule 6(eX3)(AXii) or (iii). 2 EFTA00600055 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 3 of 11 work-product of Epstein's legal counsel; (2) the correspondence is protected under grand jury secrecy principles codified at Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) because its subject matte

District of Florida (USAO/SDFL) and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein to prove the Crime Victims' Rights Act (C

nformity with the above prescriptions within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of entry of this order. 4. The motion for protective order submitted by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Leficowitz [160, 161] and motion for protective order submitted by limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein [162], seeking the continued su

tervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz's opposition to the motion, including motion for protective order [DE 160, 161]; intervenor Jeffrey Epstein's opposition to the motion, including motion for protective order [DE 162]; intervenors' notice of supplemental authority in support of asserted comm

Rule 6(e)(3)(A)(ii) or (iii). 2 EFTA00602808 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 3 of 11 work-product of Epstein's legal counsel; (2) the correspondence is protected under grand jury secrecy principles codified at Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) because its subject matte

District of Florida (USAO/SDFL) and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein to prove the Crime Victims' Rights Act (C

nformity with the above prescriptions within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of entry of this order. 4. The motion for protective order submitted by Intervenors Black, Weinberg and Lefkowitz [160, 161] and motion for protective order submitted by limited Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein [162], seeking the continued sup