Epstein Secrets

office. I informed her that I wanted to get copies of the sworn statements our clients gave to FBI investigators during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, and that I needed instructions from her as to the proper procedure. 3. Ms. Moore informed me that it was a three-step process: First, I should ser

ein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find federal subpoenas for the sworn statements of several witnesses taken during the investigation of Jeffrey Edward Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe

3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEI

/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEM, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

, FL 33169 aat":6926E.-."09 C007 LIMNS esPN 02 1P $ 000.61 ° 0003952374 MAR 17 2010 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33160 EFTA00128728 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Eplin Page 1 of 1 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:01 PM To: (USAFLS) Good afternoon I= I spoke with she made me

tance. Parale al Sec., FBI https://www.324mail.corn/owanae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAAJ2YReGj4eTp5Q... 3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:25 AM To: (USAFLS) Good morning U, I just received a copy of

investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio

orth Miami Beach, FL 33169 Re: Jane Does 2-7 v. Jeffrey stein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought " Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

'2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

ing the FBI to comply with a subpoena duces tecum for their sworn statements given to FBI investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motion, filed no opposition, but instead instructed Plaintiffs' undersigned counsel that such an Order i

investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin I. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

'2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

ing the FBI to comply with a subpoena duces tecum for their sworn statements given to FBI investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motion, filed no opposition, but instead instructed Plaintiffs' undersigned counsel that such an Order i

investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents

'2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

ing the FBI to comply with a subpoena duces tecum for their sworn statements given to FBI investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motion, filed no opposition, but instead instructed Plaintiffs' undersigned counsel that such an Order i

investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0

to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin I. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege regarding the documents