Epstein Secrets

ng to send to Jeff Sloman for his review next. Subject: Revised Epstein Disclosure I was the line attorney assigned to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct with minor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury

ed to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct with minor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury with an offense that would have resulted in no prison time. "But then the United States Attorney's Office

attorney assigned to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct wi

inor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury with an

ein matter, one of the victims' private attorneys complained to the Florida Bar about letters that I sent to unrepresented victims notifying them of the Special Master's selection of the attorney representative, accusing me of soliciting business on behalf of the attorney representative. (Edward Davis served as the

: Saturdayllay_Mi 2011 11:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Epstein Disclosure I was the line attorney assigned to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct with minor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury

ed to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct with minor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury with an offense that would have resulted in no prison time. "But then the United States Attorney's Office

attorney assigned to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct wi

inor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury with an

ein matter, one of the victims' private attorneys complained to the Florida Bar about letters that I sent to unrepresented victims notifying them of the Special Master's selection of the attorney representative, accusing me of soliciting business on behalf of the attorney representative. (Edward Davis served as the

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pagc 35 MR. ACKERMAN: Very brief. THE COURT: Give the court reporter your name. MR. ACKERMAN: Joseph Ackerman for Jeffrey Epstein. The Court will recall when we were here last time, Mr. Scherer stood up and said his clients were shown the files for LM as part of a Ponzi Schem

Rothstein, individually, and Mr. Edwards, individually, regarding -- the genesis of which was a civil suit that Mr. Edwards had filed against Mr. Epstein, which has since settled. That civil suit was brought by Mr. Edwards to the Rothstein firm. It was the linchpin of the settlements that Mr. Rothst

E JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS. INC

a civil suit that Mr. Edwards had filed against Mr. Epstein, which has since settled. That civil suit was br

re decisions that only Judge Carney can make once he has the rest of this information in front of him. THE COURT: We're taking an extra step from the Special Master's recommendation and report. We could have -- I could have Farmer and Edwards, for their respective clients, review the disk, prepare a privilege lo

eving that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.) • "I c

/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), moves' this Court for an in camera inspection of

liver the accompanying sealed Memorandum by November 9, 2018. Edwards was instructed to deliver a response sealed Memorandum by November 16, 2018. 2Epstein has reduced the original 47 e-mails for in camera review down to 30 e-mails. 3Farmer Jaffe agreed to produce all work-product related to closed case

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

ls related to new or ongoing cases conditioned on a "For Attorneys' Eyes Only" basis until such time as the Court overruled any privilege claim upon the Special Master's (or Court's) review with counsel present. (See Exhibit 3.) During its in camera review, this Court must consider and determine: 1. The e-mails ar