Epstein Secrets

, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MOTION TO STRIKE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY This is a motion by limited intervenors Jeffrey Epstein and attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz, to strike the plaintiffs' notice of supplemental authority [DE 173] because the "authority" cited by

a negotiations and therefore her comment is irrelevant. The facts leading up to Ms. Haddad's comment are these: In a separate civil proceeding, Mr. Epstein has sued attorney Bradley Edwards in state court for abuse of process. Jeffrey Epstein is represented in that state civil action by Tonja Haddad; Mr

UTHORITY This is a motion by limited intervenors Jeffrey Epstein and attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefko

gotiations. This is absurd. The issues raised by Mr. Epstein and the intervening attorneys before this Court i

y /S/ ROY BLACK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 On Behalf of Limited Intervenors Jeffrey Epstein And Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz 4 EFTA00208184

rs The second group consists of The Palm Beach Post and The Palm Beach Daily News. These entities moved for limited intervention in order to oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion for protective order that sought to require sealing all pleadings that attached certain documents disclosed in discovery (DE305). The distr

enor Jeffrey Epstein be included and that, consistent with the Court's and Local Rule I 6.2(e)'s mandates that all the parties appear in person, Mr. Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Ja

the United States requests that only intervenor Jeffrey Epstein be included and that, consistent with the

s mandates that all the parties appear in person, Mr. Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HIS

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DE159). Epstein's motio

filed their motions to intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. 2 EFTA00211681 These entities moved for limited intervention in order to oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion for protective order that sought to require sealing all pleadings that attached certain documents disclosed in discovery (DE305). The distri

enor Jeffrey Epstein be included and that, consistent with the Court's and Local Rule 16.2(e)'s mandates that all the parties appear in person, Mr. Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HISTORY REGARDING INTERVENTION This action involves a petition filed on behalf of two individuals ("Jan

, the United States requests that only intervenor Jeffrey Epstein be included and that, consistent with th

mandates that all the parties appear in person, Mr. Epstein be required to attend in person. PROCEDURAL HIST

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Leflcowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion

rs The second group consists of The Palm Beach Post and The Palm Beach Daily News. These entities moved for limited intervention in order to oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion for protective order that sought to require sealing all pleadings that attached certain documents disclosed in discovery (DE305). The distri

nd was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorney

einberg, and Jay Leflcowitz, who all represented Jeffrey Epstein in connection with a federal criminal inv

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion

rs The second group consists of The Palm Beach Post and The Palm Beach Daily News. These entities moved for limited intervention in order to oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion for protective order that sought to require sealing all pleadings that attached certain documents disclosed in discovery (DE305). The distri

nd was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorney

einberg, and Jay Leflcowitz, who all represented Jeffrey Epstein in connection with a federal criminal inv

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion