Epstein Secrets

Epstein, Tyler McDonald, Tyler McDonald D/B/A/ YLORG Case No.: 14-21348 CA 01 Dear Judge Smith: Please find enclosed a courtesy copy of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Response to Motion for Ruling on Service of Process on Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein without a Hearing. Because the Plaintiffs attorney, Mr. Titone,

ion for Ruling on Service of Process Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, filed his Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Ruling on Service of Process. Mr. Epstein maintains his prior positions with regard to Plaintiffs failure to properly serve him in what is now 2 years and 10 months after the filing of Plain

that failed attempt. 3. The undersigned counsel promptly fded a motion to quash on behalf of Mr. Epstein in April 2015, which motion included Mr. Bpstoin's affidavit confirming the location of his residence and usual place of abode in the United States Virgin Islands. 4. Plaintiffs waited a full yea

dividually and MCI Model & Talent Miami, LLC vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Tyler McDonald, Tyler McDonald D/B/A/ YL

tion to Motion for Ruling on Service of Process. Mr. Epstein maintains his prior positions with regard to Plai

:for pule County, Man FL roans,..2d SERIFS ,.. • • Schwartz, J., of burglary, robbery, attempt- ed murder and grand larceny, and he ap- pealed. The District Court of Appeal held that evidence that defendant and accom. plies gained •entry through trickery rather than breaking and entering did not proecnt reversible er

Palm Beach County, Edward H. Fine, J., entered judgment in favor of patron. Store appealed. (Holding:) The District Court of Appeal, Streitfeld, Jeffrey R., Associate Judge, held that store was liable for patron's attorney fees on the basis of offer of judgment rule. Reversed and remanded. West Headn

ct Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. Jeffrey JONES, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC.,

ial, the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward H. Fine, J., entered judgment in favor of patron. Store appealed. (Holding:) The District Court of Appeal, Streitfeld, Jeffrey R., Associate Judge, held that store was liable for patron's attorney fees on the basis of offer of judgment rule. Reversed

. Harold E. WOLFE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Jeffrey T. FOREMAN, et al., Appellees. No. 3D10-3055. I

oe County, David J. Audlin, Jr., J., granted attorneys' and law firm's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff partner appealed. Holdings: The District Court of Appeal, Rothenberg, J., held that: III litigation privilege barred the abuse of process claim, and (21 litigation privilege bared the malicious prosecut