Epstein Secrets

m When the Witness Clearly Told the FBI that She was not a Victim 252. Undated Kirkland & Ellis LLP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 254. Undated Confidential Plea Negotiati

mination of Epstein re: 29. 9/1/2006 Palm Beach Count Police Department Incident Report (burglary) 30. 11/16/2006 Letter from 16 to Sanchez" re: Epstein's willingness to provide documents and information for the investi 1 ation 31. 1/16/2007'8 Taped Interview o 32. 1/16/2007'9 Taped Interview o

LP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law i

LP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law in

Jane Doe, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, 08- CV-80119 t5 Robert Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., attorney representative. 46 Robert Critton, Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP. 4 Office, Southern District of Florida. , attorney for petitioners in Jane Doe No. 1, et al. v. M., 08-80736. 49 Pages appear to be missing from

t 113 Entered on FLSD Docket O5/22/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON

that the no-contact order agreed to during the state plea colloquy does not apply to any of ow clients except for those victims who were part ofMr. Epstein's state plea. Ourtmdastanding is that AUSA Villafana and Messrs. Twin and Goldberger entered a verbal agreement at the time that the list of victim

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/

victims was provided to those defense counselthat Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have' no direct or

Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 515 North Hagler Drive, Suite 400 West P 3401 Pho • nuns or e n „Teffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.

brought to Defendant's mansion in or about the spring of 2003, when she was merely 17 years old and in high school. Epstein's procurer drove her to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. Plaintiff was led up a flight of stairs by a blonde woman to a spa room with a shower and a massage table, where she was left alone. A woma

Thank you for your response to my earlier e-mail. Our communications with Mr. Black and later with Mr. Lefkowitz were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering our question with finality. You have now made clear that

Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay and Roy: Thank you for your re

with Mr. Lefkowitz were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecutio

. 1011. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robed Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 reritebeldlaw.cQm Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Aus

brought to Defendant's mansion in or about the spring of 2003, when she was merely 17 years old and in high school. Epstein's procurer drove her to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. Plaintiff was led up a flight of stairs by a blonde woman to a spa room with a shower and a massage table, where she was left alone. A woma

Thank you for your response to my earlier e-mail. Our communications with Mr. Black and later with Mr. Lefkowitz were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering our question with finality. You have now made clear that

Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay and Roy: Thank you for your re

with Mr. Lefkowitz were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecutio

101 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80591-MARRIWOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 rcritebcldlaw.com Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Aus

NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 101'

9 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 101'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MODIFIED BY DEFENDANT'S

ever been allowed is misplaced; this case involved only a single violation of a predicate statute. Moreover, Defendant's reliance on its own Doe vs. Epstein line of cases is, at a minimum, premature. Accordingly, in the instant case, not only was it proper for Plaintiff to plead multiple counts in the

101 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue Sou

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

ant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003000CMEAG ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON TIFF. PLEADINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON EDWARDS' COUNTERCLAIM FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS THIS CAUSE havin

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in

0 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)459-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-842-2820 Fax: (561)-844-6929 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &

her & Coleman LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dear Bob, May this letter please serve as my invoice for hours on the Epstein matter for June of 2010. During this time period in preparation for the eventuality of a jury trial I reviewed the following documents that were se

04 892 4843 Unit 3112 Fax: 866 825 8832 Atlanta, GA 30308 Cell: www.TrialAdvice.cora Email: Tuesday July 13, 2010 Mr. Robert Craton Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dear Bob, May this letter please serve as my invoice for hours on the Epstein matter fo