Epstein Secrets

d States during the time when Jane Doe was trying to take his depositon. In fact, on February 16, 2010, counsel for Jane Doe took the deposition of Jeffrey Epstein's house manager, Janusz Banaziak. Mr. Banaziak was asked if he knew Mr. Brunel. In summary, he responded that he knew him as Mr. Epstein's friend. H

osition date of September 22, 2009 at 10:00 A.M. in New York City, New York. Brunel is an important witness in this case, as he is a good friend of Epstein's and has information regarding Epstein's pattern and practice of obtaining young girls for sexual purposes, relevant issues not yet admitted by De

al purposes, relevant issues not yet admitted by Defendant Epstein. Shortly after Brunel was served, counsel for Ja

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893

el. In summary, he responded that he knew him as Mr. Epstein's friend. He elaborated that Mr. Brunel had staye

Bradley J. Edwards SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Esq. Robert D. Critton Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Related Cases: 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80994, 08-80811, 09-80591, 09-80656, 08-80380,

T OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MAR

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893

119-MARRA/JOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court - Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Esq. Robert D. Critton Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsber

d his motion for reconsideration (DE #560). Jane Doe will respond to this amended motion for reconsideration. ARGUMENT Jane Doe has an interest in Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Reconsideration (DE #560), which should be dismissed as utterly without merit (and seemingly filed simply for obstructionist purposes).

BE DENIED Plaintiff, Jane Doe, respectfully files this notice of interest in a matter that is currently pending before the Court — namely, DE #560, Epstein's (Revised) Motion for Modification and Reconsideration of the Magistrate's Order Dated June 10, 2010 (DE #555). While Jane Doe is not a direct pa

. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-8

. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Al n I r q. Robert D. Critton Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia 7 EFTA00725629

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802,

80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80119, 08

. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-8

119-MARRA/JOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court - Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er Esq. Robert D. Critton Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsber