Epstein Secrets

Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 6 EFTA00175540 Case 9:08-cv-8uo04-KAM Document Entered ..i FLSD Docket 09115L . J8 Page 7 of 8 SERVICE LIST Doe Epstein, et. al. CASE NO: 08-80804-Civ-MARIUUJOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Lut

natabase - flsd Page 1 of 6 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Doe v. Epstein et al Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson ' Case in other court: 15th Judicial Circuit, 50 2008 C

stion Plaintiff Jane Doe represented by Spencer Todd Kuvin Ricci Leopold 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens , FL 33410 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Fax: 515-2610 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Theodore Jon Leopold Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Garden

SD Do t 3.8/1b,..,08 Page 4 of 21 Iktb4-1 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOVVING IS TO REFLECT Al .l TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMEN*1 Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 1 NP.---_.. SIMI .,lister _Dellloe a D 06CF009454A Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3.FEI rocuring Person Under 18 for

nying as moot 2 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/5/08. (ir) (Entered: 08/06/2008) 08/08/20(8 a r ns KB MOTION Defendant Jeffiwy Epstein's Opposed Motion to Align Response Date by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed OrderXTein, Michael) (Entered: 08/08/2008) 08/13/2008

F.3d at 1314. conditions, and sensitive protocols concerning the fact of Epstein's previously disclosed incarceration. See DE 24 in Jane Doe No. 2 I. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-CV-80119-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Feb. 6, 2Q08) (disclosing fact of Epstein's criminal sentence and incarceration); DE 19 in Jane Doe No

1332: the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; Defendant Epstein is a citizen of the U.S. Virgin Islands; and Def

Al .l TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMEN*1 Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 1 NP.---_.. SIMI .,liste

Al .l TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMEN*1 Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 1 NP.---_.. SIMI .,lister

a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. 1, Plaintiff, vs. IF'.F .EY EPSTEIN , and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO OPPOSIT

fraudulent, Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [DE 11] is GRANTED. 2. This case shall be REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, case No. 50 2008 CA 006596, for lack of subject matte

EY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND IDENTIFY JANE DOE NUMBERS 101 AND 102 IN THIRD PART

CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00182748 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 2 JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE

OHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 10

v. Epstein Page 4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, her

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,

nt. We express no opinion as to the ad- missibility of any statements made by Wood either before or after the breach of the contract. REVERSED and REMANDED. C.A.I I (Fla.),1986. U.S. v. Wood 780 F.2d 929 O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 4 haps://web2.westlaw.com/pr

5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse wit

. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims I6 Where. are they P9-w-li IN Rights- Act lawsuit,['401 I (then known as higgeat payers jn the Jeffrey , alleged in a sworn affidavit that at age 17, Epstein case (httesyiwww.youteke,c • she had been sexually trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine orr

ds; other terms of the settlement were confidential-14.171W- Epstein was accused of sex trafficking of minors at his mansion at.? Pat Tie streiA- V. Epstein and Maxwell (2019) 144.4.24.1 :11.C.rtiuf Lit TR906/11.4-13CuCe: Cr-cifiCek - a `RS Oca) gapilkie On. April 16, 2019, public and. filed a swor

use of the passport to enter France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Saudi Arabia in the 19805. The passport showed his place of 1;191 ••• U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein indictment@l EFTA00262310 PoucE.: REPt r - 'Jr/ erctet_ 44 KEST - Pouic6 -rARGETI NG etr-te )(vow.< - EPS T E!N comPeCT 1:› isc aft N PM& •

APP H SHAW DEFENDANT APPEARS Represented By: MS H SALVEMINI APPEARING AT PT ADELAIDE 14 Due Care - Basic Offence/Fail To Give. Personal Dctall lb REMANDED Officer On Request/Resist Polite/Fail Tb Comply With Direction - Alcotest/Breath Analysis PLEA: NO PLEA PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - TO CONTINUE (165470

ING: CASE CLOSED on 07/20/2010 Document Number: 222 Docket Text: ORDER re [220] Appeal of Magistrate Judge Order [218] to District Court, filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate's Order is set aside and this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the directives of thi

ubject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893-ICAM Doe 1 Epstein Order Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:10:29 +0000 Imp

ate Judge Order [218] to District Court, filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate's Order is set aside and

ER re [220] Appeal of Magistrate Judge Order [218] to District Court, filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate's Order is set aside and this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the directives of this Order. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 10/20/2010. (ir)

FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Appeal of Magistrate's Order. (DE 220). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the submissions and is

93-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Cou

. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before

's Motion for Protective Order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 1. The Magistrate Judge's Order is SET ASIDE and this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the directives of this Order. 2. Defendant is directed to file a reply memorandum

S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1 , 18 L. Ed.2d 865 (1967); Buchanan Rhodes. 885 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 83, 17 .Ed.2d 9 (1966); Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed2d 794 (1962). Since in this case we affirm that refusal, we need not now decide whether or not there is juri

, Gary A. Hughes, J.D, Steven D. Najarian, J.D., Jeffrey A. Schafer, J.D., and Jeffrey J. Shampo, J.D. II

y are more ap- propriately ft to state factfinders and be- cause the involve hypothetical circum- stances.. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED. LYNNE, District Judge, dissenting: In my opinion the discussion and affirm- ance of the district court's denial of an injunction are inappropriat