Epstein Secrets

ASSMCATION STATE AM' CLASS i" CENTRAL RCDS NTA LOCI • •. • • F.P. CLEAR: MED.CLEINI IN: Ix, JUL: .1 NOB EFTA00231493 A48 Order granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2009 tf IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CRIM

by the ~ant. EFTA00231492 A47 Palm Beach Sheriffs Office Booking Card for Jeffrey Epstein, dated June 30, 2008 04/26/2010 14:51 3553626 NAME: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY ALMS NAMES: OVER 8 NANCE EPSTE7. JEFFREY - EPSTEIN. JEFFREY EDWARD- MORday. Aim 30. 2008 I I:33:10 AM iNCARcEFLATiON DATE/TIME 06/30/20

JUL: .1 NOB EFTA00231493 A48 Order granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18,

he would masturbate into a towel while receiving a massage. In other cases he would of the victim with his hands or . One 14 year old.described how Epste and thereafter, when contacted by law enforcement, she had to identify the offender through the use of a to arra . Another 16- ear-old victim desc

rmination Hearing, dated August 26, 2010 Supreme gnarl of tht Stott of 41eb twit August _26. 2_0111' LOO CENTRE STREET NEW YORK. N.Y. WOO Mr. Jelimy Epstein 9 East 71' Street New York. N.Y. 10021 Re: SCID # 30129-2010 Dear Mr. Epstein: Please be advised that pursuant to the 1996 Sex Offender Registra

JUL: .1 NOB EFTA00231493 A48 Order granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2

the level of registration that was applicable to Mr. Epstein's case Under Florida's registration scheme there

.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 1, 3). Appellant concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. §§ 796.07(2)(f), (4)(c) -- a solicitation offense which does not include any elements of sexual contact with underage women and which i

Patrick Egan, Esq. Assistant District Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Thal Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We beli

ct Attorney's Office Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

ct Attorney's Office Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

hat Epstein never used any force)? As previously noted, Jeffrey Epstein concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stet § 794O2)(0, (4Xc), which is nor a registerable offense under Florida or New York law. See Fla. Stat. § 943.0435;M. Correction Law § 168-a

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to a

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We hope

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #301

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

hat Epstein never used any force).2 As previously noted, Jeffrey Epstein concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)0), (4Xc), which is not a registerable offense under Florida or New York law. See Fla. Stat. § 943.0435; N.Y. Correction Law

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to a

keep track of specifically when different events with Epstein took place). While= could not say with certainty when she first met and massaged Mr. Epstein= stated definitively and unambiguously that she was 17 years old during their single instance of brief sexual intercourse, when she claimed that Mr.

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #301

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

hat Epstein never used any force).2 As previously noted, Jeffrey Epstein concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)0), (4Xc), which is not a registerable offense under Florida or New York law. See Fla. Stat. § 943.0435; N.Y. Correction Law

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We hope

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

when she was nearly 18 years old). As previously noted, Jeffrey Epstein concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), (4Xc), which is not a registerable offense under Florida or New York law. See Fla. Stat. § 943.0435; N.Y. Correction Law

A51 Letter from Jack A. Goldberger to NYS Sex Offender Registry Regarding Florida Registration Level applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 A51-A52 ACTERBURY GOLDBERGER ' JOSEPH R ATTERBURY ' 1 JACK A. GOLDBERGER ' JASON S.WEISS ' Board Certified Crimoal Trial

e of Florida that required sex offender registration. The purpose of this letter is to clarify the level of registration that was applicable to Mr. Epstein's case Under Florida's registration scheme there are two levels of registration available based on a risk assessment. Florida characterizes these t

garding Florida Registration Level applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 A51-A52 ACTERBU

garding Florida Registration Level applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 A51-A52 ACTERBUR

the level of registration that was applicable to Mr. Epstein's case Under Florida's registration scheme there

.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 1, 3). Appellant concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. §§ 796.07(2)(f), (4)(c) -- a solicitation offense which does not include any elements of sexual contact with underage women and which i

w York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 e€u laurk Supreme Trani APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JAY P. LE•FKOWITZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Aven

E OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR DE

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. BRI

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. BRIE

.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 1, 3). Appellant concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. §§ 796.07(2)(f), (4)(c) -- a solicitation offense which does not include any elements of sexual contact with underage women and which i

iv EFTA00792573 INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

YWELL Notary Public State of New York No Qualified in Kings County Commission Expires November 15. 2012 /s/ Howard Daniels Case Name: People v. Epstein EFTA00792607

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REP

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REPL

discretion, based on her assessment of the allegations, witness credibility, and other factors, the Florida prosecutor only indicted one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07. No charge of rape or sexual contact with a minor under 17 was ever charged or prosecuted in connection with any allegations m

INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

A hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Supreme Co

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York S

at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Su

witness credibility, and other factors, in an exercise of prosecutorial discretion, she determined that the only indictable charge was one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07. No charge of rape or sexual contact with a minor was ever charged or prosecuted in connection with any allegations made again

rk County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 '.ex 'Dark Sul:mettle Tourt APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. rI BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JAY P. LEFKOWITZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI KnAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Aven

E OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. rI BRIEF FO

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. rI

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. rI

.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 1, 3). Appellant concurrently pleaded guilty to an Indictment charging him with one count of Felony Solicitation for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. §§ 796.07(2)(0, (4)(c) -- a solicitation offense which does not include any elements of sexual contact with underage women and which is