Epstein Secrets

@M(1 EFTA00191518 Epstein, Jeffre Fed ex Sat delivery on cro Dan and Nancy SHtin ro NM fny ' ay Land 87056 on Store t 505 8 2 4339 Epsteanin, Jeffrey Zone Ren 49 Zorro Ranch Road Stanley. NM 87056 Email: zorroranch@aol_corn 5 832 2696 Line 2 office) 5 1 832 2675 Line 1 Cite) 5 5 El

4IL 33480 561 1 r if) 561 561 1- 93 (hi) 581 881 3 91 -5748 Voice Mad (h) Elwes, Anabel 41A Limerston Street 0 Lon 0do629 n S 5955W10 27- Epstein, Ed 430 East 86th 0001 8 wwwwwwwerwersagarannintr," ~8W Erba Noona r0o e boons 39 2)47 510(w(h) 39025500 ) Espirito Santo, Manuel and Ros gg

rn (Hm}1800 skyPage 917940 6157 (py lea Blachon, Magali 1100 Toulouse. 11 33 68 2917179Tnce aricialitighz cregoi r 0010110VCIO Parents Epstein, Jeffrey 9 Eyt 71 10021 h) rotect HmN.forcGar 24 East 63rd Account* 7..EP02 14' 917 1 309 1 917 45 QI) r,ichael fp 59 Dennis • F owers 'P P)ge

Devito, Dawn 7 ki Atlan Ave. nda 33480 rn Sant St atenown MA , F 3t2 +An Pa:hat:act Home 41-4-931485tede island Driver - PB 305 491 1998 Ray Epstein, Jeffrey . ,el spnng 126Lka Rebega Drive 358 Ei Bon Way _ ___, Palm Beach, F 334ou <.?",Y1, oiql.4' Vest 7 2 New Suburban Staff Suburban st

harbe and 323 933-8783 Domestic only rte. brolumMohn 800 239 6269 Virgin specialist TWA 001 800 221 2000 X188925144 frequent lief num. WEMI (JE) frequent Mr number United Airlines 001 800 241 6522 #00385250614 frequent Met # 00316924999 frequent flyer X J.E. US Air Frequent Travel*, Ce

4 014 • 7 2 9 7 331 441 7 1 quest line 331 44 8 455 Ms Guerin 1 :12 90 Ms eres(conc.) 79 Ms. Pens 09 592 853 Ms. Peres (p) 1 44 01 4401 ktr. Stephane Epstein, Jeffrey (G) Stanch Aphronone 22 Avenue Apartment 20 Psris. Franca 5116 331 441 70 10 331 441 TO 11if) Email: epsteinab! nnadoo.frtyalds (Hm

el- ernewenues) N908JE 917 497 4880 spare 727 p 11 881 6314 54353 satellite - 0,111M881 6314 54123 sateSte - 8i1" 17 545 6300 Guest cel Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein interests AlWm 4 64548 457 Madison il 10 Ave022nue - ath Floor Al 'e---- EFTA00191564 7 - • ( Unleg rATIA " 131runi .."•> 2013 203 9 iiit

zoeoh eel 301 402 2773(13 gol 202 237 60204h Email: stemberd notional Tom, Maggie 0207-486 9272 Victor, Steve Dr. E 760S. (P&M) 68 51 917 ES Gabor 561 832 9385 Bard, Dr. Perry 42750 Okeechobee Blvd (w) tWEI , FLGQ033409 rnia I: d 'Ili:117 aoIsom frImi 36 5.0/ceafillart nd i9) 87 U s4

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND SUPPORTINGMEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, by and

UCTION Edwards's Motion to Strike is based solely upon his erroneous argument that this Court's consideration of the probable cause issue raised in Epstein's Motion for Summary Tonga Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fon Lauderdale, FL 33301. EFTA00808559 Judgment is batted by the law of the case doc

IRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BRADL

or judicial proceeding . . ."). Accordingly, Edwards's Motion to Strike should be denied on the grounds of both the law of the case and estoppel. B. Epstein Did Not "Actually Present" to the Fourth District Court of Appeal the Issue of Probable Cause The positions Edwards now takes in his Motion to Stri

ternative argument as to probable cause for this Court's consideration. See Nat'l City Bank v. Accent Marketing Assoc., supra. Edwards argues that Gabor v. Gabor & Co., Inc., 599 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) "is directly on point." See Edwards's Motion to Strike, p. 5. However, the Gabor case is cl

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO: DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND SUPPORTINGMEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respect

49 Introduction Edwards' motion to strike is based solely upon his argument that this Court's consideration of the probable cause issue raised in Epstein's motion for summary judgment is barred by the law of the case doctrine. Edwards argues that the probable cause issue was raised by Epstein as a po

IRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BRADL

lternative argument as to probable cause for this Court's consideration. See Nat'l City Bank v. Accent Marketing Assoc., supra. Edwards argues that Gabor v. Gabor & Co., Inc., 599 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) "is directly on point." Motion to Strike at 5. Gabor is clearly distinguishable. In that ca