lternative argument as to probable cause for this Court's consideration. See Nat'l City Bank v. Accent Marketing Assoc., supra. Edwards argues that Gabor v. Gabor & Co., Inc., 599 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) "is directly on point." Motion to Strike at 5. Gabor is clearly distinguishable. In that ca

ternative argument as to probable cause for this Court's consideration. See Nat'l City Bank v. Accent Marketing Assoc., supra. Edwards argues that Gabor v. Gabor & Co., Inc., 599 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) "is directly on point." See Edwards's Motion to Strike, p. 5. However, the Gabor case is cl

zoeoh eel 301 402 2773(13 gol 202 237 60204h Email: stemberd notional Tom, Maggie 0207-486 9272 Victor, Steve Dr. E 760S. (P&M) 68 51 917 ES Gabor 561 832 9385 Bard, Dr. Perry 42750 Okeechobee Blvd (w) tWEI , FLGQ033409 rnia I: d 'Ili:117 aoIsom frImi 36 5.0/ceafillart nd i9) 87 U s4

40.37 3210,624.37 100% Accruals 0.339.29 12841.91 3.502.62 Market Value with Accruals $1,702,665.29 $1,916,692.28 $214,026.99 erne. Ecu y Gabor Snort Timm a sea inCrne Current Year-to-Date Portfolio Activity Period Value Value Beginning Market Value 1,693,316.00 6,377,327.40 Contr

inches 3.500 3.500 Little River in France Oil on paper Sztybel. Pamela 11 3/4 x 17 1/2 inches Big Blue Eclipse 1970 Color etching Peterdi. Gabor 40 x 30 inches Half-Note No. 8 1994 Steel Lee. Jenny 20 1/2 x 4 x S inches REDON. ODILON Poemes Western Union 1964 Mixed media on paper B