Epstein Secrets

nt in this case. In this Court's Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement in the case styled Jane Doe No. 6 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-80994-CIV-Marra ("Jane Doe No. 6) this Court rejected any contention by the Defendant that the Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp

civious, and sexual acts, including, EFTA00201211 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009 Page 2 of 18 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiffs Memorandum in Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Co

12, 2009, this Court entered the Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement in the case styled Jane Doe No. 6 v. Jeji-ey Epstein, Case No. 08-80994-UV-Marra.' In that Order, the Court granted the Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement with respect to allegations conce

The interpretation of Section 2255 urged by the Defendant Epstein implicates the same concerns EFTA00201218 Case

0811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. PLAINTIFF

atement in the case styled Jane Doe No. 6 v. Jeji-ey Epstein, Case No. 08-80994-UV-Marra.' In that Order, the

the predicate federal criminal statutes. The underlying approach to statutory construction was succinctly set forth in the Fifth Circuit decision in Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service, 988 F.2d 32 (51h Cir. 1993): The sole purpose of statutory construction, including, when appropriate, a review of all

0811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF F

ff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTION TO PAGE FOUR OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION, AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; MOTION TO STRIKE, AND S

rida Bar No.: 0547808 orneys or ain EFTA00201229 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2009 Page 2 of 3 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Correction to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant Jeffrey

Motion to Dismiss, and states as follows: Plaintiff's Memorandum contains a typographical error on page four. The last sentence of the quote from Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service, 988 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1993) on the top of page four reads "We may not look beyond them when, taken as a whole, they are

ff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTION TO PAGE FOUR OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION, AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; MOTION TO STRIKE, AND S

Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Plaintiff EFTA00722726 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2009 Page 2 of 3 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Correction to Plaintiffs Memorandum in Response to Defendant Jeffrey E

0811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF F

, Motion to Dismiss, and states as follows: Plaintiffs Memorandum contains a typographical error on page four. The last sentence of the quote from Hammers v. internal Revenue Service, 988 F.2d 32 (5" Cir. 1993) on the top of page four reads "We may not look beyond them when, taken as a whole, they are

From: Zorro Ranch <[email protected]> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Brice Gordon Subject: ZDC_PIANO_REPAIR 043014 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:30:31 +0000 Attachments: ZDC_PIANO_REPAIR 043014.p

Zorro Ranch <[email protected]> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Brice Gordon Subject: ZD

From: Zorro Ranch <[email protected]> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Brice Gordon Sub

ose timing pins - 6 hrs @ $100 per hr $600.00 Action Keys - Rebush Frnnt - as needed $200.00 Rebush Balance - as needed $200.00 Recondition etc Hammers $400.00 2 Trip Charges @ $100 each $200.00 Tuning $250.00 SubTotal $1,850.00 Tax $112.16 Total $1,962.16 The liming Action is to be remov

ght silent piano (that you can play with earphones) works as well or only a synthesizer? On Sep 11, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Lesley Groff < wrote: Nili, Jeffrey says a synthesizer piano would be fine but a regular piano is not. Hope that works for Ehud. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 11, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Nili

my iPhone On Sep 11, 2015, at 21:36, Ehud Barak <1 > wrote: Hi Leslie Thank you very much. Please ask Anthony whether this is a real piano with Hammers and chords or an electric synthesizer "looks like" a piano. I want to bring a real Upright Silent Piano. Try to check with him asap and inform me.