Epstein Secrets

due by 5/29/2009), MOTION to identify jane doe #102 in the third-party subpoenas for purposes of discovery, with incorporated memorandum of law by Jeffrey Epstein.(see docket entry 5 for image) (tas) (Entered: 05/12/2009) https://eef.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.p17825839498761356-L_801 0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA001

09-80656-CIV-Ryskamp JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOS

erve so Epstein can defend this case. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: EFTA00175214 • Case 9:09-c

10/03/2008 4 r 82.8 KB ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to 2 Summons Issued, 1 Complaint Acknowledgement filed by Jane Doe No. 7. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/03/2008) 10/03/2008 5 fi 26.1 Ica NOTICE of Striking 4 Acknowledgment of Service filed by Jane Doe No. 7 by Jane Doe No. 7 (Her

175301 CM/Eg - Live Database - flsd Page 4 of 7 05/20/2009 18 n NOTICE by of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Defendant, Jeey Epstein's Motion to Compel And/Or Identify in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Altern

7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO

finate StatementDefendant's MOTION to Dismiss 7 Amended Complaint or in the Alternative, for a More Definate Statement Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 10I's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Page Limits for Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement by

F APPEARANCE Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP and Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. hereby file their appearance as counsel for Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN in the above-styled matter. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by U.S. Mail to THEODORE J. LEOPOLD

8, 2008 TIME: 8:45 A.M. JUDGE: The Honorable Jonathan D. Gerber ADDRESS: 201 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MATTER: Defendant Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Robson's Motion to Quash Service of Process I hereby certify that a good faith effort has been made

ixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 MATTER: Defendant Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Ro

l guardian - --- . . —.-.. — • 1 )1;. - rawer Jeffrey Epstein, all= -- - - ....._€"4-1,. (ro c?: Su

ng July 10, 2008. As good cause for this motion, Mr. Epstein states as follows: 1. The complaint in this act

TE DIVISION DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME The Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby serves his Motion for Enlargement of Time pursuant to Rule 1.090(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, within which to serve a responsive pleading to the Complaint. Defendant requests an ad

THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY TRIAL JUDGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorney and

: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY TRIAL JUDGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorney and pursuant to Rule 2.330 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration and § 38.10 of the Florida St

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ts that I have 16 reviewed, for example, reflect Mr. Epstein's 17 access to airplanes. See Transcript of Oct

ctober 3, 2017, the parties to this action were before this Court on several Motions, one of which was Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to certain Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") on September 25, 2017, which Responses were due on

2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

ify Jane Doe in Third Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, and state as follows: I. Defendant Epstein filed his Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, et al., in the cases brought by Jane Does No. 2-7 ("Does 2-7") on May 5 and 6, 200

to Dismiss Sua Sponte, and state as follows: I. Defendant Epstein filed his Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane D

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE ET AL Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third Party Subpoen

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, -vs- FANCELLI PANELING, INC., Defendant, -vs- J.P. MOLYNEUX STUDIO, LTD., Nominal Defendant. CASE NO. ST-10-CV-443

on this 30 day of , 2012 and by email to: 3 EFTA00602422 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FANCELLI PANELING, INC., and ) ■. MOLYNEUX STUDIO, LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) ) NO. ST-10-CV-443

s for the parties were obliged to meet pursuant to the Court's EXHIBIT 1 EFTA00602423 AMENDED NOTICE OF MEETING OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO RULE 26O) Epstein, et at v. Fancelli Paneling, Inc., et aL Page 2 order to confer to stipulate to a revised discovery schedule and (proposed) Scheduling Order on, or

GIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC, Plaintiffs, -vs- FANCE

FonceM Paneling, Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT that I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Enlargement of Time to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, V 00804 and upon by fust class U. S. Mail, nostage