3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
10 / 3
Mentions
eving that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.) • "I c
/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), moves' this Court for an in camera inspection of
liver the accompanying sealed Memorandum by November 9, 2018. Edwards was instructed to deliver a response sealed Memorandum by November 16, 2018. 2Epstein has reduced the original 47 e-mails for in camera review down to 30 e-mails. 3Farmer Jaffe agreed to produce all work-product related to closed case
OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT
th attorney-client and work product) to Conrad, Scherer, an adversarial party's counsel, Edwards waived those privileges. See § 90.507, Fla. Stat.; Delap v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242, 1247 (1983). See also Tucker v. State, 484 So. 2d 1299, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("The law is clear that once communications prot
/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this M
FENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this Memorandum of Law as to the Doctrines of Waiver of Attorney-Client and Work Product protections as claimed by Edwards and at issue
OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT
ion. § 90.507, Fla. Stat. In plain English: "When a party himself ceases to treat the matter as confidential, it loses its confidential character." Delap v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242, 1247 (Fla. 1983). See also Tucker v. State, 484 So. 2d 1299, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ("The law is clear that once communications
SE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY DEFENDANT BRADLEY EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned
onse to several orders entered by Judge Raymond Ray in the Bankruptcy Court, filed a one hundred and fifty-nine (159) page privilege EFTA00582857 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards DRAFT 2/3/12 4:26 PM Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG log, claiming that over two thousand (2000) documents are pri
x-wife). The attorney-client privilege is waived if the client voluntarily discloses the substance of the communication. See § 90.507, Fla. Stat.; Delap v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242, 1247 (Fla. 1983) ("[W]hen a party himself ceases to treat the matter as confidential, it loses its confidential character."). Edw
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Delap v. State

George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON
Chris Tucker
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIONMarc S. Nurik
PERSONScherer
PERSONthe Florida Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONWilliam Scherer
PERSONConrad Scherer
PERSONAss'n, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONTIG Ins. Corp.
ORGANIZATIONa Clear Adversary
ORGANIZATIONGenovese v. Provident Life & Acc
ORGANIZATION