orable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the disc that were listed on his privilege log ha

s to produce a Privilege Log by January 31, 2011. While a Privilege Log was presented timely, Plaintiff objected that it was not in compliance with TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Parties met with your Special Master on February 16, 2011 and came to an agreement for productio

other patties to assess the applicability of the privilege or protection. The key case in this District construing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(5) is TIG Ins. Corp., 799 So. 2d 339, in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal denied a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order requiring TIG,