Epstein Secrets

United States Attorney' t of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client and The U.S. Attorney's Office has learned that rey stein as app ied to participate in the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office's ("PBSO") work release program, and PBSO has ranted that a lication. Mr. E ste

tein ias app ied to participate in the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office's ("PBSO") work release program, and PBSO has ranted that a lication. Mr. E stein is reportedly working for The Florida Science Foundation at est Palm Beach, FL 33401. After work each day, Mr. Epstein returns to the Palm Beach C

est Palm Beach, FL 33401. After work each day, Mr. Epstein returns to the Palm Beach County Stockade. While

's handling of the matter involving your client, Jeffrey Epstein. We have received and reviewed your lette

REY EPSTEIN RAL EFCOUR ESQ. OUNSEL TO JF_FER .Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

reserve all documents and data relating to the claims set forth in the Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime'Victim's Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771 (DE 1) ("Victim's Petition") in Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-Marra/Johnson in the Southern District of Florida, filed on July 7, 2008. Based upon the fa

osecution Agreement, an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at 13).' Included in this preservation order are all Documents and data, including electronically stored information ("ES1"), relating to th

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein Dear Rolando: I write in my capacity as

Villafana indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA) entered into negotiations t

reserve all documents and data relating to the claims set forth in the Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771 (DE 1) ("Victim's Petition") in Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-Marra/Johnson in the Southern District of Florida, filed on July 7, 2008. 1 request that y

osecution Agreement, an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at ¶3).' I I assume those involved in the above-referenced litigation, have copies of the relevant court filings, but if you desire any of t

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting co

on of It• indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA] entered into negotiations t

reserve all documents and data relating to the claims set forth in the Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771 (DE I) ("Victim's Petition") in Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-Marra/Johnson in the Southern District of Florida, filed on July 7, 2008. Based upon the fa

osecution Agreement. an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at ¶3).r I assume those involved in the above-referenced litigation, have copies of the relevant court filings, but if you desire any of the

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting co

A. Marie indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA] entered into negotiations t

reserve all documents and data relating to the claims set forth in the Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771 (DE I) ("Victim's Petition") in Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-Marra/Johnson in the Southern District of Florida, filed on July 7, 2008. Based upon the fa

osecution Agreement, an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at ¶3).' I I assume those involved in the above-referenced litigation, have copies of the relevant court filings, but if you desire any of t

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting co

Villafafia indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA] entered into negotiations t

reserve all documents and data relating to the claims set forth in the Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771 (DE I) ("Victim's Petition") in Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-Marra/Johnson in the Southern District of Florida, filed on July 7, 2008. Based upon the fa

r contribute to a criminal investigation or prosecution is a far different matter than simply making a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00087189 IC LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

lic statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DIST

ng a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTH

TA00087185 LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 pursuant to the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771, to permit certain witnesses and certain non-testifying witnesses to be referred to by pseudonyms. And there is also the issue of redacting relate

r contribute to a criminal investigation or prosecution is a far different matter than simply making a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00099084 IC LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

lic statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DIST

ng a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTH

TA00099080 LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 pursuant to the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771, to permit certain witnesses and certain non-testifying witnesses to be referred to by pseudonyms. And there is also the issue of redacting relate

r contribute to a criminal investigation or prosecution is a far different matter than simply making a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00102339 IC LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

lic statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DIST

ng a public statement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTH

TA00102335 LB1TMAX1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 pursuant to the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 USC Section 3771, to permit certain witnesses and certain non-testifying witnesses to be referred to by pseudonyms. And there is also the issue of redacting relate