Epstein Secrets

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pagc 35 MR. ACKERMAN: Very brief. THE COURT: Give the court reporter your name. MR. ACKERMAN: Joseph Ackerman for Jeffrey Epstein. The Court will recall when we were here last time, Mr. Scherer stood up and said his clients were shown the files for LM as part of a Ponzi Schem

Rothstein, individually, and Mr. Edwards, individually, regarding -- the genesis of which was a civil suit that Mr. Edwards had filed against Mr. Epstein, which has since settled. That civil suit was brought by Mr. Edwards to the Rothstein firm. It was the linchpin of the settlements that Mr. Rothst

E JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, JR., ESQUIRE On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS. INC

a civil suit that Mr. Edwards had filed against Mr. Epstein, which has since settled. That civil suit was br

ause if the trustee believed that -- THE COURT: There's no litigation pending. MR. FARMER: That we -- Edwards and LM have not been sued -- I mean, Lichtman's been sued, Adler. People have been brought in by the trustee because they've found evidence that they believe constitutes some wrongful conduct,

nts are held by the trustee now, and so Mr. Stettin was concerned that there may be some privilege issues on those documents, and as a result, Mr. Lichtman and the attorneys came forward before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I beca

htman, Berger Singerman, for the trustee. MIL NE1V/IRTH: Good morning, your Honor. Ronald Neiveinh, Fowler White Burnett, on behalf of the movant, Epstein, and with me today are two of my partners, Chris Knight and Lilly Ann Sanchez — MS. SANCHEZ: Good morning, your Honor. 10 10 MR, K1410HT: Good m

bankruptcy. 7 s or, beholtof victims 7 THE COURT: All right. That leaves us with 9 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. NEMIRTM ESQUIRE 9 motion. 10 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ATTORNEY-ATLAW CHRISTOPHER B KNIGHT, ESQUIRE 10 MR. NEIWIRTH: Thank you, your Honor,

E BURNETT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. NEMIRTM ESQUIRE 9 motion.

unclear, because we had 23 Despite all of this, Mr. Epstein has 24 just taken over the case from another law

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

htman, Berger Singerman, for the trustee. MIL NE1V/IRTH: Good morning, your Honor. Ronald Neiveinh, Fowler White Burnett, on behalf of the movant, Epstein, and with me today are two of my partners, Chris Knight and Lilly Ann Sanchez — MS. SANCHEZ: Good morning, your Honor. 10 10 MR, K1410HT: Good m

bankruptcy. 7 s or, beholtof victims 7 THE COURT: All right. That leaves us with 9 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. NEMIRTM ESQUIRE 9 motion. 10 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ATTORNEY-ATLAW CHRISTOPHER B KNIGHT, ESQUIRE 10 MR. NEIWIRTH: Thank you, your Honor,

E BURNETT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. NEMIRTM ESQUIRE 9 motion.

unclear, because we had 23 Despite all of this, Mr. Epstein has 24 just taken over the case from another law

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

RTH: Good morning, your Honor. 6 In Re. 6 Ronald Neivrinh, Fowler White Burnett, on behalf of 7 ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLfl. P.A.., 7 the movant, Epstein, and with me today are two of my s Debtor 8 partners, Chris Knight and Lilly Ann Sanchez - 9 9 MS. SANCHEZ: Good morning, Your Honor. 10 ti

cruptiry. 7 s on beloiltofeictkret 7 THE COURT: All right. That leaves us with 9 FOWLER MITE. BIJRN6TT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. M3TWIRTIL ESQUIRE 9 motion. 10 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ATIORNEY•AT.LAW 10 MR. NEIWIRTH: Thank you, your Honor, and CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT,

BIJRN6TT, by 8 Docket Entry 807 and 819. 807 is Jeffrey Epstein's RONALD 0. M3TWIRTIL ESQUIRE 9 motion.

unclear, because we had 23 Despite all of this, Mr. Epstein has 24 just taken over the case from another law

, your Honor, may it 4 those, et cetera, our client has already offered 4 please the Court Again, Gary Fanner on behalfof 5 to the trustee, to Mr. Lichtman, we will pay for 5 the interested party, LM, also on behalf of 6 it, whether ifs a special master or whether it's 6 Brad Edwards and I'm sorry, y

US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Florida Southern (West Palm Beach) 9:08cv8011 9 Doe v. Epstein This case was retrieved from the court on Wednesday, March 04, 2015 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket:

hments: # 1 Exhibit)(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 10/16/2009) 10/16/2009 353 RESPONSE in Opposition re 331 MOTION for Protective Order as to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Attendance at Plaintiff's Deposition and Notice of Incorporation of Notice of Reliance of Supplemental Authority (DE 324) filed by Jeffrey Epstein.

/08.(ir) (Entered: 02/08/2008) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (lk) (Entered: 05/27/2008)

3/2009) 425 Defendant's MOTION Attend Mediation Defendant Epstein% Motion to Attend Mediation and Memorandum in Su

2009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

Are you aware of strong reservations having been expressed by Gary Farmer to turning over the discs containing potentially privileged materials to Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel. MR. IANNO: You're asking if he was aware then or based on reading this? BY MR. SCAROLA: Q Are you aware, as you sit here today, t

Farmer Jaffe. MR. IANNO: Joseph Ianno, Carlton Fields, on behalf of Fowler White. MR. LINK: Scott Link and let Jennifer Lettman on behalf of Mr. Epstein. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00803635 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2

EFTA00803632 L 1 2 3 4 APPEARANCES: For Jeffrey Epstein: LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beac

Scott Link and let Jennifer Lettman on behalf of Mr. Epstein. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995

f communications on the next page purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes

eval service. - OR - Call 1.866.540.8818. US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Fiorida Souther (West Palm Beach) 9:09cv80469 Doe II'. Epstein et al This case was retrieved from the court on Sunday, July 18, 2010 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket

(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 10/21/2009) 10/21/2009 365 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL of Motion by C.M.A. re 331 MOTION for Protective Order as to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's. Attendance at Plaintiff's Deposition filed by C.M.A. DOCKET CORRECTION SEE DE 363 FOR IMAGE (tp) (Entered: 10/22/2009) 10/21/2009 367 REPLY to R

r) (Entered: 04/21/2008) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7. 2008. filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Herman. Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A and B. # 2

0/21/2009) RESPONSE/REPLY to 60 Amended Document Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's F

009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

you. MR. PIKE: Thank you. THE COURT: What else needs to be addressed here? MR. PIKE: Good morning, Judge. My name is Michael Pike, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. May I 6 (Pages 18 to 21) (561) 832-7500 PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. (561) 832-7506 Electronically signed by Pamela Sullivan (501-333-772

e. My name is Michael Pike, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. May I 6 (Pages 18 to 21) (561) 832-7500 PROSE

ually, Defendant. HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE JEFFREY STREITFELD Monday, November 23, 2009 2:06 p.m.

n on this matter, having spoken with him 20 numerous times about numerous other matters, to 21 speak either with him or with his counsel 22 Mr. Lichtman. I did have the opportunity to speak 23 with Mr. Coffey on Friday. 24 !can, if it would assist the Coun, proffer 25 to the Court and, if necess

From: Evelyn Sheehan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:20 AM To: Sheehan, Evelyn B. (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/PubArticleDBR.jsp? id=12025349915688Jeffrey_Epstein_lawyers_want_to_depos

scammer Scott Rothstein during his two-week deposition beginning next week. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray in Fort Lauderdale set the hearing on Epstein's arguments. Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution following accusations that he had sex with girls, completed his year of

:20 AM To: Sheehan, Evelyn B. (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein h

y organized this proceeding and who may be able to answer any other questions which you may have in this regard. Sincerely, Larry LaVecchio, AUSA Lichtman responded to Ackerman as follows: As I have explained, there will be a large number of parties already authorized to ask questions on discrete issu