Epstein Secrets

12 WL 5395249 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2012) 2 iii EFTA00100289 Other Authorities Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 11 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) 13 Fed. R. Cr

is this: The defamation case should have been extremely narrow, but Boies Schiller transformed it into something much broader—a proxy prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell for allegedly trafficking and abusing Giuffre, which then compelled Maxwell, over objection, to answer irrelevant and highly prejudicia

now disclosed several documents "with respect to any criminal investigations" 3 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nydailynews.corninew-yorktny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-2020

LES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN &

ounts Five and Six, which are the fruits of that unlawful subpoena. Factual Background The facts relevant to this Motion are described in Maxwell's Pretrial Motion No. 3 and the Reply in Support Thereof. Argument I. The Government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. The government does not

12 WL 5395249 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2012) 2 iii EFTA00097333 Other Authorities Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 11 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) 13 Fed. R. Cr

is this: The defamation case should have been extremely narrow, but Boies Schiller transformed it into something much broader—a proxy prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell for allegedly trafficking and abusing which then compelled Maxwell, over objection, to answer irrelevant and highly prejudicial person

LES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN &

ounts Five and Six, which are the fruits of that unlawful subpoena. Factual Background The facts relevant to this Motion are described in Maxwell's Pretrial Motion No. 3 and the Reply in Support Thereof. Argument I. The Government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. The government does not

12 WL 5395249 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2012) 2 iii EFTA00097651 Other Authorities Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 11 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) 13 Fed. R. Cr

is this: The defamation case should have been extremely narrow, but Boies Schiller transformed it into something much broader—a proxy prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell for allegedly trafficking and abusing which then compelled Maxwell, over objection, to answer irrelevant and highly prejudicial person

LES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Mennin • er Christian R. E

ounts Five and Six, which are the fruits of that unlawful subpoena. Factual Background The facts relevant to this Motion are described in Maxwell's Pretrial Motion No. 3 and the Reply in Support Thereof. Argument I. The Government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. The government does not