Epstein Secrets

he Defendant identified five individuals who require notice, but the Subpoena appears to seek personal and confidential information about all of the Epstein victims that BSF represents, which is more than five individuals. Thus, in an abundance of caution, BSF will notify each of the Epstein victims it

Defendant with two counts of jury for lying under oath during a civil deposition in a defamation action brought by when asked if she was aware of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme and whe er s e a ever iven Minor Victim-2 a massage. BSF represents Minor Victim-2 i and but does not represent and has ne

ction brought by when asked if she was aware of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme and whe er s e

Defendant can therefore procure from the Government. Thus, a Rule 17(c) subpoena to BSF for those documents is improper. See, e.g., United States v. Bergstein, No. 16 Cr. 746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017) ("When `many' of the subpoenaed materials are obtainable through the discove

Request 12, which seeks "any" submission to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program made by BSF, fails

e Government's briefing regardless of standing as part of its duty to ensure that the subpoena meets the requirements of Nixon. See United States v. Bergstein, No. I6-CR-746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017). But ex parte Rule 17(c) subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if just

Request 12, which seeks "any" submission to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program made by BSF, fails

e Government's briefing regardless of standing as part of its duty to ensure that the subpoena meets the requirements of Nixon. See United States v. Bergstein, No. I6-CR-746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017). But ex parte Rule 17(c) subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if just

Request 12, which seeks "any" submission to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program made by BSF, fails

e Government's briefing regardless of standing as part of its duty to ensure that the subpoena meets the requirements of Nixon. See United States v. Bergstein, No. I6-CR-746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017). But ex parte Rule 17(c) subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if just

Request 12, which seeks "any" submission to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program made by BSF, fails

e Government's briefing regardless of standing as part of its duty to ensure that the subpoena meets the requirements of Nixon. See United States v. Bergstein, No. I6-CR-746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017). But ex parte Rule 17(c) subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if just