Epstein Secrets

rtin G. Weinber P.C. Boston, MA 02116 Reid Weingarten, Esq. Michael Miller, Esq. Ste toe & Johnson LLP New York, NY 10036 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Mr. Weinberg: The Government writes in response to your letters dated July 26, 2019, requesting preservation and production

on LLP New York, NY 10036 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Mr. Weinberg: Th

oitation and Obscenity Section, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Homeland Security, the New York [City] Police Department, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County, the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, the New Mexico At

, custody, or control of this Office, irrespective of the source from which those files were obtained. Third Request: Communications regarding Mr. Epstein between and among "Main Justice" (including the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) and the United States Attorney's Offices for the Southern

tained. Third Request: Communications regarding Mr. Epstein between and among "Main Justice" (including the

Dear Counsel: Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Paglitica PH Fx www.hmflaw.com Defendant G

ualized massages for herself. Instead, the claim appears to be that Ms. Maxwell recruited and groomed minors to provide sexualized massages for Mr. Epstein, which would amount to grooming-by-proxy. Dr. Dietz is aware of no authority—no journal articles, no studies, no tests, nothing—to support a theory

roomed minors to provide sexualized massages for Mr. Epstein, which would amount to grooming-by-proxy. Dr. Di

ace, the health and legal systems, and even for decision making and consumer choices. (p. 286) Like many people who achieve great power and wealth, Jeffery Epstein exploited the Halo effect to surround himself with people who would serve his needs. At the most primitive level, his wealth attracted those seekin

on LLP New York, NY 10036 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Mr. Weinberg: Th

rtin G. Weinber P.C. Boston, MA 02116 Reid Weingarten, Esq. Michael Miller, Esq. Ste toe & Johnson LLP New York, NY 10036 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Mr. Weinberg: The Government writes in response to your letters dated July 26, 2019, requesting preservation and production

of Georgia (or FBI agents working therewith). and Exchange Commission; the Department of Homeland Security; the New York [City] Police Department; the Manhattan District Attorney's Office; the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County; the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office; the New Mexico At

n produced as part of the Government's initial discovery production to the defendant on July 31, 2019. Third Request: Communications regarding Mr. Epstein between and among "Main Justice" (including the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) and the United States Attorney's Offices for the Southern

, 2019. Third Request: Communications regarding Mr. Epstein between and among "Main Justice" (including the

r, "An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 9 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 12 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. am

ing a time- honored if unfortunate litigation tactic, her lawyers at Boies Schiller therefore sought to turn the lawsuit into a proxy prosecution of Epstein. Not surprisingly, discovery in the case was bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging. It spanned more than a year and included large document product

replied, "I don't know what you're talking about." And when asked to "[I]ist all the people under the age of 18 that you interacted with at any of Jeffrey's properties," Maxwell responded, "I'm not aware of anybody that I interacted with, other than obviously [M I who was 17 at this point." Count Five

r, "An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 9 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 12 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. am

ing a time- honored if unfortunate litigation tactic, her lawyers at Boies Schiller therefore sought to turn the lawsuit into a proxy prosecution of Epstein. Not surprisingly, discovery in the case was bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging. It spanned more than a year and included large document product

replied, "I don't know what you're talking about." And when asked to "[I]ist all the people under the age of 18 that you interacted with at any of Jeffrey's properties," Maxwell responded, "I'm not aware of anybody that I interacted with, other than obviously [=I who was 17 at this point." Count Five

r, "An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020) 9 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 12 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. am

ing a time- honored if unfortunate litigation tactic, her lawyers at Boies Schiller therefore sought to turn the lawsuit into a proxy prosecution of Epstein. Not surprisingly, discovery in the case was bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging. It spanned more than a year and included large document product

replied, "I don't know what you're talking about." And when asked to "[I]ist all the people under the age of 18 that you interacted with at any of Jeffrey's properties," Maxwell responded, "I'm not aware of anybody that I interacted with, other than obviously [M I who was 17 at this point." Count Five