Epstein Secrets

LORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Pla

d allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers sent to the government. The quote, in its entirety, is five or six words. The quote is redacted from the public filing but it is

Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 [email protected] On behalf of Jay Epstein 17 EFTA00210733 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 295 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 18 of 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY tha

TES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICA

ar tactics before. In prior civil litigation with Mr. Epstein, one of plaintiffs' lawyers, Mr. Edwards, throug

EQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS `GOOD CAUSE' Citing Brown I. Advantage Eng g, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson I. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth "the extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

LORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Pla

d allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers sent to the government. The quote, in its entirety, is five or six words. The quote is redacted from the public filing but it is

TES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICA

ar tactics before. In prior civil litigation with Mr. Epstein, one of plaintiffs' lawyers, Mr. Edwards, throug

EQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS `GOOD CAUSE' Citing Brown v. Advantage Eng I, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth "the extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARFtA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN=S RESPONSE To ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs= lawyers filed P

lawyers and parties in this case are already bound by a Protective Confidentiality Order issued by this Court on September 21, 2014, finding that AEpstein has shown good cause to prevent potential dissemination of the correspondence between the government and the intervenor to the press for the purpos

TATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN=S RESPONSE To ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICA

ar tactics before. In prior civil litigation with Mr. Epstein, one of plaintiffs= lawyers, Mr. Edwards, throug

REQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IS >GOOD CAUSE= Citing Brown v. Advantage Eng=g, Inc, 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992), and Wilson v American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court has requested that we set forth Athe extraordinary circumstances or particularized needs necessitating a

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 1 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON -------------~/ Related cases: 08-8

ERNATIVE RULE 4 APPEAL, WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Modification and Reconsideration of the Magistrate's Order (DE 555) pursua

ROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through h

1986). Thus, while the public may enjoy the right of access to "pleadings, docket entries, orders, affidavits or depositions duly.filed," Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 569 (11 th Cir. 1985) ( emphasis added), common-law right of access does not extend to information collected through discovery whic