Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

ERNATIVE RULE 4 APPEAL, WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Modification and Reconsideration of the Magistrate's Order (DE 555) pursua

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 0

e 1400 FL 33401-5012 Counsel for Defendant Jefj•ey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edw

upon review of the book or journal by Epstein's criminal lawyer, Jack Goldberger, Esq., it appeam thc "book" or "journal" doca contain the namea of Epatcin's busiftetts-asseeimes-antl-ether--highlr eetifttleyttitt4-eemtitereittilt settstitive-infermatiett-thttt-wett4d he entirely irrelevant to thio act

ough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. agg, a g., Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I --------------- Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591,09-80656,

OF THE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER DATED JUNE 1, 2010 (DE 555), WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Modification and Reconsideration of the Magistrate's Order (DE 555) pursua

TED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through h

hrough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, M·, Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 1 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON -------------~/ Related cases: 08-8

ERNATIVE RULE 4 APPEAL, WITH INCORPORATED OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Modification and Reconsideration of the Magistrate's Order (DE 555) pursua

ROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through h

hrough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, M·, Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

WEINBERG FROM: KIMBERLY HOMAN RE: DISSEMINATION OF STOLEN DOCUMENTS DATE: JUNE 2, 2010 There are at least two potential avenues through which JE can seek to obtain return of the stolen book and/or a prohibition against dissemination by Rodriguez (leaving aside the procedural issues present a

ough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, e.g., Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o