Epstein Secrets

Tr iti, BB liFINTS.Y rneCnOn tent loss &This' Am um twenty°tnousand five hundred dollars and 00/100 Upon Acceptance pay to Ge. L.S.J., LW & Jeffrey E. Epstein Order of ca...nn—... ........ Signatur 0.0(A, t 2 Signatures Required over 510,000 Notice to Holder: VOID if not presented within 90 Days VE

stein C/O New York Strategy Group LLC 457 Madison Ave. New York, NY. 10022 RE: Claim #: Date of Loss: Your Policy #: Loss Location: Dear Mr. Epstein: 30859 11/21/2006 3459170 Little St. James Island No. 68 St. Thomas, USV 00801 Payment has been issued for $20,500 for the damaged New Holland T

heck No. 596030 DATE OF ISSUE a ' urea LLC & Jeffrey E Epstein. Claim Office 825 Case # • 30859 Sym

0/100 Upon Acceptance pay to Ge. L.S.J., LW & Jeffrey E. Epstein Order of ca...nn—... ........ Signatu

te of Loss: Your Policy #: Loss Location: Dear Mr. Epstein: 30859 11/21/2006 3459170 Little St. James Is

K NAME First National Bank NAME/ACCOUNT TITLE Rose Bros., Inc. ADDRESS 3rd end Mein Street ADDRESS PO Box 319 CITY. STATE, ZIP CODE, COUNTRY Lingle, WY, 82223, USA CITY. STATE, EP CODE, COUNTRY Ung!e, WY, 82223, USA ORIGINATOR REFERENCE: BENEFICIARY REFERENCE: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

82223 Bankers Bank of the West 1099 18th Street Suite # 2700 Denver CO 80202 ABA# Further Credit to: First National Bank 3rd and Main Street Lingle, WY 82223 Account Requested By: Emad Hanna Purpose/Description: LSJ Project # 301 Special Instructions: Purchase of a New Holland Tractor Gil

due by 5/29/2009), MOTION to identify jane doe #102 in the third-party subpoenas for purposes of discovery, with incorporated memorandum of law by Jeffrey Epstein.(see docket entry 5 for image) (tas) (Entered: 05/12/2009) https://eef.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.p17825839498761356-L_801 0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA001

09-80656-CIV-Ryskamp JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOS

erve so Epstein can defend this case. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: EFTA00175214 • Case 9:09-c

10/03/2008 4 r 82.8 KB ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to 2 Summons Issued, 1 Complaint Acknowledgement filed by Jane Doe No. 7. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/03/2008) 10/03/2008 5 fi 26.1 Ica NOTICE of Striking 4 Acknowledgment of Service filed by Jane Doe No. 7 by Jane Doe No. 7 (Her

175301 CM/Eg - Live Database - flsd Page 4 of 7 05/20/2009 18 n NOTICE by of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Defendant, Jeey Epstein's Motion to Compel And/Or Identify in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Altern

7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO

right. D.R. Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore,

5/05/2009 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I ------------- MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY S

POENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein" or "Defendant"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this Court enter an order identifying in the style of this case th

Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 [email protected] Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: ~~~~~:.--ii:i'"""ccr- R D. CRI N, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 m

to Dismiss Entire Action Sua Sponte. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: I. Motion And Incorporated Me

deem just an Robert D. • ton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

ght. D.R. Lakes. Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore,

ff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respec By: D. CRI •N, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N.

POENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY. OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein" or "Defendant"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this Court enter an order identifying in the style of this case th

eem just an Robert D. Ckitton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

19-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDE

to Dismiss Entire Action Sua Sponte. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: I. Motion And Incorporated Me

ight. D.R. Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore,

Motion To Identify Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys and

IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. , Motion For Protective Order And Alternative Motion To Ide

ICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. , Motion For Protective Order And Alternative Motion To Identify Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("M

laintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Motion For Sanctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Es

CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Defendant Epstein's Mo

right. D.R. Lakes. Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore 7

t 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #7 IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR P

OENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW1 Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein" or °Defendant"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this Court enter an order identifying in the style of this case th

-CV-80993-MARRA JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDE

stress. Plaintiff alleges separate counts against Mr. Epstein, on which he must conduct discovery to defend th

right. D.R. Lakes. Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. Atth DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 41h DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore,