Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2009 Page 1 of 24 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON ----------~/ JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintif

HNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON I Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2009 Page 2 of 24 Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/Johnson Epstein's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 2 of24 JANE DOE NO. 6, Plainti

majority of Mr. Cassell's assertions in his affidavit are based on a 2005 Vanity Fair article (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity Fair <http://vickyward.com/wordpress/archives/30>, (January 24, 2005; accessed June 24, 2009). Mr. Cassell's affidavit is essentially a

Weinstein .... " See Vicky Ward, "You Will Have Jeffrey Epstein to Kick Around!" Vanity Fair <http://www

unction cannot be used to enforce money damages or prevent a party of disposing of assets prior to the conclusion of an action at law." Id. See also Briceno v. Bryden Investment, Ltd., 973 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (noting that in Florida, an injunction cannot be entered to prevent a party of d

to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165). Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a response in opposition to the mot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON T JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469

rt upon Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Motion for Injunction Restraining Fraudulent Transfer of Assets, Appointment of a Receiver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 Million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment (DE 165). Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a response in opposition to the motion (DE 198

7). In Florida, an injunction cannot be entered to prevent a party from using or disposing of his assets prior to the conclusion of a legal action. Briceno v. Bryden Investments, Ltd., 973 So.2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). See also SME Racks, Inc. v. Sistemas Mecanicos Para, Electronica, S.A. , 243 Fed

Son's Wrongdoing Colors DOJ Inquiry EFTA00160374 • Trump Suggests He Knowingly Took Documents From White House • Records of Florida Grand Jury's Jeffrey Epstein Investigation Can Be Made Public • Criminal Investigation Into Sen. Bob Menendez Expands With New Subpoenas • Lori Vallow Daybell Trial: Jurors Beg

and EFTA00160380 those who have not been criminally charged. There is a public interest in knowing whether the wealthy and politically connected Epstein, who lived in a Palm Beach mansion, was given special treatment, the court ruled. Criminal Investigation Into Sen. Bob Menendez Expands With New Sub

om White House • Records of Florida Grand Jury's Jeffrey Epstein Investigation Can Be Made Public • Crimi

Top INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 18 Years After Natalee Holloway's Disappearance, Peru to Extradite Key Suspect to U.S. Business Insider (05/11, Cano, Briceno) reported that Peru's government will allow the extradition to the United States of the prime suspect in the unsolved disappearance of Natalee Hollo

t 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'13'2009 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN! Defendant. JANE DOE

OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS. APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN. AND TO POST A $15 MILLION BOND TO SECURE POTENTIAL JUDGMENT Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, submi

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,

tion cannot be used to enforce money damages or prevent a party of disposing of assets prior to the conclusion of an action at law." Id, .5_e_e also Briceno v. Bryden Investment, Ltd., 973 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (noting that in Florida, an injunction cannot be entered to prevent a party of d

From: Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:56 AM To: Jefffrey Epstein Subject: James Ce James Ce needs a few minutes of your time to discuss where in =he house you would like to install/setup Google Wifi ...then an

uesday, December 13, 2016 12:56 AM To: Jefffrey Epstein Subject: James Ce James Ce needs a few minutes

ave him come =omorrow at 3pm to meet quickly with you then get working? (he is only =vailable tomorrow after 2pm) Tues. Dec. 13, 2016 NY Reminder: Briceno fly ABQ to SFO w 10:0am Appt w/Anthony Barrett 10:30am Appt 1:00pm Conference Call w/Don Rubi 1:00pm Appt 2:00pm Appt w/Deepak 4:00pm Appt w/L